rok commented on code in PR #41257:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/41257#discussion_r1571011302


##########
docs/source/format/CanonicalExtensions.rst:
##########
@@ -251,6 +251,24 @@ Variable shape tensor
    Values inside each **data** tensor element are stored in 
row-major/C-contiguous
    order according to the corresponding **shape**.
 
+.. _json_extension:
+
+JSON
+====
+
+* Extension name: `arrow.json`.
+
+* The storage type of this extension is ``StringArray`` or
+  ``StringViewArray``.
+
+* Extension type parameters:
+
+  This type does not have any parameters.
+
+* Description of the serialization:
+
+  Metadata is an empty string.

Review Comment:
   Year, that makes sense as we are promising [backwards 
compatibility](https://arrow.apache.org/docs/format/CanonicalExtensions.html#making-modifications):
   
   > Making Modifications
   > Like standard Arrow data types, canonical extension types should be 
considered stable once standardized. Modifying a canonical extension type (for 
example to expand the set of parameters) should be an exceptional event, follow 
the same rules as laid out above, and provide backwards compatibility 
guarantees.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to