westonpace commented on a change in pull request #9533:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9533#discussion_r592264611
##########
File path: cpp/src/arrow/util/async_generator.h
##########
@@ -177,6 +179,94 @@ class TransformingGenerator {
std::shared_ptr<TransformingGeneratorState> state_;
};
+template <typename T>
+class SerialReadaheadGenerator {
+ public:
+ SerialReadaheadGenerator(AsyncGenerator<T> source_generator, int
max_readahead)
+ : state_(std::make_shared<State>(std::move(source_generator),
max_readahead)) {}
+
+ Future<T> operator()() {
+ if (state_->first) {
+ // Lazy generator, need to wait for the first ask to prime the pump
+ state_->first = false;
+ auto next = state_->source();
+ return next.Then(Callback{state_});
+ }
+
+ // This generator is not async-reentrant. We won't be called until the
last
+ // future finished so we know there is something in the queue
+ auto finished = state_->finished.load();
+ if (finished && state_->readahead_queue.IsEmpty()) {
+ return Future<T>::MakeFinished(IterationTraits<T>::End());
+ }
+
+ auto next_ptr = state_->readahead_queue.FrontPtr();
+ auto next = std::move(**next_ptr);
+ state_->readahead_queue.PopFront();
+
+ auto last_available = state_->spaces_available.fetch_add(1);
+ if (last_available == 0 && !finished) {
+ // Reader idled out, we need to restart it
+ ARROW_RETURN_NOT_OK(state_->Pump(state_));
+ }
+ return next;
+ }
+
+ private:
+ struct State {
+ State(AsyncGenerator<T> source_, int max_readahead)
+ : first(true),
+ source(std::move(source_)),
+ finished(false),
+ spaces_available(max_readahead),
+ readahead_queue(max_readahead) {}
+
+ Status Pump(const std::shared_ptr<State>& self) {
+ // Can't do readahead_queue.write(source().Then(Callback{self})) because
then the
+ // callback might run immediately and add itself to the queue before
this gets added
+ // to the queue messing up the order
+ auto next_slot = std::make_shared<Future<T>>();
+ auto written = readahead_queue.Write(next_slot);
+ if (!written) {
+ return Status::UnknownError("Could not write to readahead_queue");
Review comment:
It isn't unbounded readahead. The code should be keeping track of how
many items are left in the queue (with spaces_available_). If the queue fills
up then it stops pumping futures from the generator. So at no point should it
try and write to a full queue. If it did there would be no good option. We
can't block since we are asynchronous and we can't discard the item because the
user will want it.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
