jonkeane commented on pull request #11592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/11592#issuecomment-957908069


   This is looking good. On `lubridate::is.POSIXt()` being more niche, I think 
we might want them. I implemented [a (hacky) 
version](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/a0c650415bc28920512077faecdfa9d07d3c4efe/r/R/dplyr-functions.R#L258-L261)
 of that in order to [prevent dates from getting timestamped in 
`strftime`](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/a0c650415bc28920512077faecdfa9d07d3c4efe/r/R/dplyr-functions.R#L776-L782).
 What about them were you thinking would be confusing?
   
   The name `is_timestamp` doesn't need to remain the same, I purposely didn't 
use `lubridate::is.POSIXt()` since we would come back, but if we can + want to 
use that instead here that would be totally fine!


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to