gabotechs opened a new pull request, #22010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/22010

   ๐Ÿ™ˆDon't look yet, still experimenting
   
   ## Which issue does this PR close?
   
   <!--
   We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and 
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases. You can 
link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example `Closes #123` 
indicates that this PR will close issue #123.
   -->
   
   - Closes #.
   
   ## Rationale for this change
   
   <!--
    Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly in 
the issue then this section is not needed.
    Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand your 
changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.  
   -->
   
   Today RepartitionExec emits one small batch per (input batch ร— non-empty 
output partition), then coalesces those small batches back into target-sized 
ones on the consumer side. That means the channel layer (memory accounting, 
gate, await suspensions) does work proportional to num_partitions per input 
batch, even though each small batch only carries batch_size / num_partitions 
rows. Moving the coalescing producer-side, before the gate, collapses the 
channel traffic and reduces sensitivity to high output fanout.
   
   ## What changes are included in this PR?
   
   <!--
   There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it is 
sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this PR.
   -->
   
   - A producer-side coalescer per output partition, shared across input tasks, 
that runs before the channel's gate.
   - The redundant consumer-side coalescer in PerPartitionStream is removed.
   - BatchPartitioner is unchanged โ€” only the layer between the partitioner and 
the channel.
   
   ## Are these changes tested?
   
   <!--
   We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
   1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
   2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
   
   If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are 
they covered by existing tests)?
   -->
   
   Yes, by existing tests
   
   ## Are there any user-facing changes?
   
   No
   
   <!--
   If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be 
updated before approving the PR.
   -->
   
   <!--
   If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api 
change` label.
   -->
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to