github  

Messages by Thread

• Re: [PR] Add relation planner extension support to customize SQL planning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add relation planner extension support to customize SQL planning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add relation planner extension support to customize SQL planning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add relation planner extension support to customize SQL planning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add relation planner extension support to customize SQL planning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add relation planner extension support to customize SQL planning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add relation planner extension support to customize SQL planning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add relation planner extension support to customize SQL planning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add relation planner extension support to customize SQL planning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add relation planner extension support to customize SQL planning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add relation planner extension support to customize SQL planning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add relation planner extension support to customize SQL planning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add relation planner extension support to customize SQL planning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add relation planner extension support to customize SQL planning [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Update Committer / PMC lis [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update Committer / PMC list [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update Committer / PMC list [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update Committer / PMC list [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update Committer / PMC list [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: integrate batch coalescer with repartition exec [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add sorted data benchmark. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add sorted data benchmark. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add sorted data benchmark. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add sorted data benchmark. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add sorted data benchmark. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add sorted data benchmark. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add sorted data benchmark. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add sorted data benchmark. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add sorted data benchmark. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add sorted data benchmark. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add sorted data benchmark. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add sorted data benchmark. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add sorted data benchmark. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add sorted data benchmark. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add sorted data benchmark. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add sorted data benchmark. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add sorted data benchmark. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add sorted data benchmark. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add sorted data benchmark. [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Coalesce batches inside hash join, reuse indices buffer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Coalesce batches inside hash join, reuse indices buffer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Coalesce batches inside hash join, reuse indices buffer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Coalesce batches inside hash join, reuse indices buffer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Coalesce batches inside hash join, reuse indices buffer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Coalesce batches inside hash join, reuse indices buffer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Coalesce batches inside hash join, reuse indices buffer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Coalesce batches inside hash join, reuse indices buffer [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore: Add TPCDS benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Add TPCDS benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Add TPCDS benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Add TPCDS benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Add TPCDS benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Add TPCDS benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • [PR] chore: Add TPCDS benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Add TPCDS benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Add TPCDS benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Add TPCDS benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Add TPCDS benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Integrate cast_column into PhysicalExprAdapter [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Integrate cast_column into PhysicalExprAdapter [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Integrate cast_column into PhysicalExprAdapter [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Integrate cast_column into PhysicalExprAdapter [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Integrate cast_column into PhysicalExprAdapter [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] [Docs] Update SQL examples in documentation for timestamp/datetime functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [Docs] Update SQL examples in documentation for timestamp/datetime functions [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: change vectorized equal to in multi column aggregation to use `BooleanBufferBuilder` instead of `&[bool]` [WIP] [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] run cargo fmt to fix after #18998 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] run cargo fmt to fix after #18998 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] run cargo fmt to fix after #18998 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: NativeScan count assert firing for no reason [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: NativeScan count assert firing for no reason [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] bench: set test_util as required feature for aggregate_vectorized [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] bench: set test_util as required feature for aggregate_vectorized [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: escape underscores when simplifying `starts_with` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: escape underscores when simplifying `starts_with` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: escape underscores when simplifying `starts_with` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: escape underscores when simplifying `starts_with` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: optimize CASE WHEN lookup table (2.5-22.5 times faster) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize CASE WHEN lookup table (2.5-22.5 times faster) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize CASE WHEN lookup table (2.5-22.5 times faster) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize CASE WHEN lookup table (2.5-22.5 times faster) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize CASE WHEN lookup table (2.5-22.5 times faster) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize CASE WHEN lookup table (2.5-22.5 times faster) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize CASE WHEN lookup table (2.5-22.5 times faster) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize CASE WHEN lookup table (2.5-22.5 times faster) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize CASE WHEN lookup table (2.5-22.5 times faster) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize CASE WHEN lookup table (2.5-22.5 times faster) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Run the examples in the new format [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run the examples in the new format [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run the examples in the new format [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run the examples in the new format [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run the examples in the new format [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run the examples in the new format [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run the examples in the new format [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run the examples in the new format [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run the examples in the new format [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run the examples in the new format [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run the examples in the new format [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run the examples in the new format [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run the examples in the new format [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run the examples in the new format [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run the examples in the new format [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run the examples in the new format [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run the examples in the new format [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run the examples in the new format [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Run the examples in the new format [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Cut `Parquet` over to PhysicalExprAdapter, remove `SchemaAdapter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Cut `Parquet` over to PhysicalExprAdapter, remove `SchemaAdapter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Cut `Parquet` over to PhysicalExprAdapter, remove `SchemaAdapter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Cut `Parquet` over to PhysicalExprAdapter, remove `SchemaAdapter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Cut `Parquet` over to PhysicalExprAdapter, remove `SchemaAdapter` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [substrait] [sqllogictest] Schema contains duplicate qualified field name [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix Schema Duplication Errors in Self‑Referential INTERSECT/EXCEPT by Requalifying Input Sides [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Schema Duplication Errors in Self‑Referential INTERSECT/EXCEPT by Requalifying Input Sides [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat(spark): implement spark hash function murmur/xxhash64 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: change Expr OuterReferenceColumn and Alias to Box type for reducing expr struct size [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: repartition for grouping set [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Adds script to detect breaking API changes/ semver [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Unnest Correlated Subquery [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [D] DISCUSSION: DataFusion Meetup in Stockholm, Sweden [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: DataFusion Meetup in Stockholm, Sweden [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: DataFusion Meetup in Stockholm, Sweden [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: DataFusion Meetup in Stockholm, Sweden [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: DataFusion Meetup in Stockholm, Sweden [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Added alter external table support for snowflake [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Added alter external table support for snowflake [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove unused CastColumnExpr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove unused CastColumnExpr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove unused CastColumnExpr [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Consolidate `CastColumnExpr` with `CastColumn` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: fix panic when lo is greater than high [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fix panic when lo is greater than hi [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fix panic when lo is greater than hi [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fix panic when lo is greater than hi [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fix panic when lo is greater than hi [datafusion] via GitHub

• Later messages