github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve projection metadata during optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Physical-plan serialization drops ProjectionExec metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Physical-plan serialization drops ProjectionExec metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Update `bench.sh` to use the new `benchmark_runner` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Update `bench.sh` to use the new `benchmark_runner` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Update `bench.sh` to use the new `benchmark_runner` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Range partition on primitives. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Range partition on primitives. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Range partition on primitives. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Range partition on primitives. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Range partition on primitives. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Range partition on primitives. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Range partition on primitives. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Range partition on primitives. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Range partition on primitives. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Range partition on primitives. [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] [branch-55] fix(ffi): use the session's LogicalExtensionCodec in create_physical_plan (#24690) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-55] fix(ffi): use the session's LogicalExtensionCodec in create_physical_plan (#24690) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-55] fix(ffi): use the session's LogicalExtensionCodec in create_physical_plan (#24690) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: keep join filter columns when pushing a projection below SortMergeJoinExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: keep join filter columns when pushing a projection below SortMergeJoinExec [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support date_bin / date_trunc satisfaction for multi-key Range partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support date_bin / date_trunc satisfaction for multi-key Range partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support date_bin / date_trunc satisfaction for multi-key Range partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: preserve MERGE target qualifier bindings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve MERGE target qualifier bindings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve MERGE target qualifier bindings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve MERGE target qualifier bindings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve MERGE target qualifier bindings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve MERGE target qualifier bindings [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
• [PR] docs(catalogs): fix punctuation and spacing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs(catalogs): fix punctuation and spacing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs(catalogs): fix punctuation and spacing [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [EPIC] Redesign DataFusion main page [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Redesign DataFusion main page [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Redesign DataFusion main page [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] IN LIST: use runtime dispatch for `FixedSizeBinary` filter (reduce binary size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: use runtime dispatch for `FixedSizeBinary` filter (reduce binary size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: use runtime dispatch for `FixedSizeBinary` filter (reduce binary size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: use runtime dispatch for `FixedSizeBinary` filter (reduce binary size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: use runtime dispatch for `FixedSizeBinary` filter (reduce binary size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: use runtime dispatch for `FixedSizeBinary` filter (reduce binary size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: use runtime dispatch for `FixedSizeBinary` filter (reduce binary size) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: use runtime dispatch for `FixedSizeBinary` filter (reduce binary size) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: reduce RANK window top-K memory from O(input) to O(K + ties) per partition [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: reduce RANK window top-K memory from O(input) to O(K + ties) per partition [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Allow dialects that use `->` as an operator to support `LAMBDA` syntax [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow dialects that use `->` as an operator to support `LAMBDA` syntax [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow dialects that use `->` as an operator to support `LAMBDA` syntax [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow dialects that use `->` as an operator to support `LAMBDA` syntax [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow dialects that use `->` as an operator to support `LAMBDA` syntax [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow dialects that use `->` as an operator to support `LAMBDA` syntax [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow dialects that use `->` as an operator to support `LAMBDA` syntax [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow dialects that use `->` as an operator to support `LAMBDA` syntax [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow dialects that use `->` as an operator to support `LAMBDA` syntax [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow dialects that use `->` as an operator to support `LAMBDA` syntax [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: support floating-point ASOF equality keys [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support floating-point ASOF equality keys [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support floating-point ASOF equality keys [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support floating-point ASOF equality keys [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support floating-point ASOF equality keys [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support floating-point ASOF equality keys [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] refactor(asof_join): enhance match value handling and comparator caching [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(asof_join): enhance match value handling and comparator caching [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(asof_join): enhance match value handling and comparator caching [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor(asof_join): enhance match value handling and comparator caching [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Honour operator precedence in `IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM` [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • [PR] Honour operator precedence in `IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM` [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Honour operator precedence in `IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM` [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Honour operator precedence in `IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM` [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Honour operator precedence in `IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM` [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Honour operator precedence in `IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM` [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Honour operator precedence in `IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM` [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Honour operator precedence in `IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM` [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Honour operator precedence in `IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM` [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Honour operator precedence in `IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM` [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Honour operator precedence in `IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM` [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Honour operator precedence in `IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM` [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Honour operator precedence in `IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM` [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Honour operator precedence in `IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM` [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Honour operator precedence in `IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM` [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Honour operator precedence in `IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM` [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add aggregate-specific metrics to legacy grouped hash and TopK [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add aggregate-specific metrics to legacy grouped hash and TopK [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.1.0` (minor/patch) Release (Sep 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Account for transformer-retained batches in symmetric hash join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Account for transformer-retained batches in symmetric hash join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Account for transformer-retained batches in symmetric hash join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Account for transformer-retained batches in symmetric hash join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Account for transformer-retained batches in symmetric hash join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Account for transformer-retained batches in symmetric hash join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Account for transformer-retained batches in symmetric hash join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Account for transformer-retained batches in symmetric hash join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Account for transformer-retained batches in symmetric hash join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Account for transformer-retained batches in symmetric hash join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Account for transformer-retained batches in symmetric hash join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Account for transformer-retained batches in symmetric hash join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Account for transformer-retained batches in symmetric hash join [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Ungrouped aggregation never charges accumulators' construction-time state to the memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Ungrouped aggregation never charges accumulators' construction-time state to the memory pool [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: charge accumulators' construction-time state to the memory pool in ungrouped aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: charge accumulators' construction-time state to the memory pool in ungrouped aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: charge accumulators' construction-time state to the memory pool in ungrouped aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: charge accumulators' construction-time state to the memory pool in ungrouped aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: charge accumulators' construction-time state to the memory pool in ungrouped aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: charge accumulators' construction-time state to the memory pool in ungrouped aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: charge accumulators' construction-time state to the memory pool in ungrouped aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] DO NOT REVIEW - BENCHMARK WINDOW [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(ffi): use the session's LogicalExtensionCodec in create_physical_plan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(ffi): use the session's LogicalExtensionCodec in create_physical_plan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(ffi): use the session's LogicalExtensionCodec in create_physical_plan [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] cache dictionary arc ptr in groupColumn [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: cache dictionary arc pointer [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: record `join_time` and output metrics in PiecewiseMergeJoin [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: record `join_time` and output metrics in PiecewiseMergeJoin [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: record `join_time` and output metrics in PiecewiseMergeJoin [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] `Session::create_physical_plan` over FFI ignores the session's `LogicalExtensionCodec` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `Session::create_physical_plan` over FFI ignores the session's `LogicalExtensionCodec` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] IN LIST: use runtime dispatch (not monomorphization) for FixedSizeBinary filter [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: use runtime dispatch (not monomorphization) for FixedSizeBinary filter [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: use runtime dispatch (not monomorphization) for FixedSizeBinary filter [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore(deps): use the released DataFusion 55.0.0 crates from crates.io [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix coalesce string numeric union coercion [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: add native GroupsAccumulator for any_value [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Support pluggable AWS credentials for the S3 object store (credentials provider callback) [datafusion-java] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] IN LIST: reuse primitive filters for FixedSizeBinary [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: reuse primitive filters for FixedSizeBinary [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: refuse memory-limited NestedLoopJoin fallback for left-emission joins with a multi-partition probe side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: refuse memory-limited NestedLoopJoin fallback for left-emission joins with a multi-partition probe side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: refuse memory-limited NestedLoopJoin fallback for left-emission joins with a multi-partition probe side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: refuse memory-limited NestedLoopJoin fallback for left-emission joins with a multi-partition probe side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: refuse memory-limited NestedLoopJoin fallback for left-emission joins with a multi-partition probe side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: refuse memory-limited NestedLoopJoin fallback for left-emission joins with a multi-partition probe side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: refuse memory-limited NestedLoopJoin fallback for left-emission joins with a multi-partition probe side [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Window functions fail when `ORDER BY` uses a `TIME` column [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix(proto): preserve CSV/JSON scan options on roundtrip [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Physical plan proto silently drops CSV/JSON scan options (newline_delimited, terminator, compression) [datafusion] via GitHub

• Later messages