gabotechs commented on PR #23975: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/23975#issuecomment-5214932249
> An earlier set of four runs on the same machine produced -50.0% and -166.7%, so the tool reports both improvements and regressions where nothing changed (it failed AA testing, basically). Is that too bad though? it's not like we are enforcing some specific benchmark numbers in the CI, users of the `dfbench statistics` cli can always apply some critical judgement when interpreting the stdout, same as with normal benchmarks, where there's always some small variability in two identical runs. Do you foresee other places where reporting might be non-deterministic? If It was just me using the tool, I think I could live with it being non-deterministic for certain operators, but in case other people don't, something that comes to mind is to add a new cli argument for skipping certain operators from the comparison. Something like: `--skip SortExec(TopK)`. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
