github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] port dfbench benchmarks to criterion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] port dfbench benchmarks to criterion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] port dfbench benchmarks to criterion [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce morsel-driven Parquet scan [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Comet 0.14.0 Release (March 2026) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Comet 0.14.0 Release (March 2026) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Comet 0.14.0 Release (March 2026) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: specialized SemiAntiSortMergeJoinStream [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: specialized SemiAntiSortMergeJoinStream [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: specialized SemiAntiSortMergeJoinStream [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: specialized SemiAntiSortMergeJoinStream [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: specialized SemiAntiSortMergeJoinStream [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: specialized SemiAntiSortMergeJoinStream [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] [EPIC] Sort-merge join (SMJ) execution improvements [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] <DRAFT> IN LIST optims [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] <DRAFT> IN LIST optims [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] <DRAFT> IN LIST optims [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] <DRAFT> IN LIST optims [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Incorrectly parsed SQL query containing GROUP BY ALL and an alias in the projection [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrectly parsed SQL query containing GROUP BY ALL and an alias in the projection [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrectly parsed SQL query containing GROUP BY ALL and an alias in the projection [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Support `columns_sorted` in row_filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support `columns_sorted` in row_filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support `columns_sorted` in row_filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support `columns_sorted` in row_filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support `columns_sorted` in row_filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support `columns_sorted` in row_filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support `columns_sorted` in row_filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support `columns_sorted` in row_filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support `columns_sorted` in row_filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support `columns_sorted` in row_filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support `columns_sorted` in row_filters [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Implement sink metrics but CSV/JSON [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Implement sink metrics but CSV/JSON [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] deps: update to iceberg-rust 0.9.0 rc1 [iceberg] [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Rewrite physical expressions in execution plans [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite physical expressions in execution plans [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Simplify logic for memory pressure partial emit from ordered group by [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Simplify logic for memory pressure partial emit from ordered group by [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Core: make sure to enable extension type support in Parquet [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Core: make sure to enable extension type support in Parquet [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add datafusion/arrow_canonical_extension_types feature [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] physical-expr-adapter: support casting structs nested inside complex types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] physical-expr-adapter: support casting structs nested inside complex types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] physical-expr-adapter: support casting structs nested inside complex types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix[physical-expr-adapter]: support casting structs nested inside complex types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix[physical-expr-adapter]: support casting structs nested inside complex types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix[physical-expr-adapter]: support casting structs nested inside complex types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix[physical-expr-adapter]: support casting structs nested inside complex types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix[physical-expr-adapter]: support casting structs nested inside complex types [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] DefaultPhysicalExprAdapterRewriter doesn't handle structs inside complex types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] DefaultPhysicalExprAdapterRewriter doesn't handle structs inside complex types [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: add `custom_string_literal_override` to unparser Dialect trait [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add `custom_string_literal_override` to unparser Dialect trait [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add `custom_string_literal_override` to unparser Dialect trait [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add `custom_string_literal_override` to unparser Dialect trait [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add `custom_string_literal_override` to unparser Dialect trait [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] perf: TPC-H and TPC-DS performance regression after DF 52 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sketch out a Morselize API [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Rewrite `SUM(expr + scalar)` --> `SUM(expr) + scalar*COUNT(expr)` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite `SUM(expr + scalar)` --> `SUM(expr) + scalar*COUNT(expr)` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite `SUM(expr + scalar)` --> `SUM(expr) + scalar*COUNT(expr)` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite `SUM(expr + scalar)` --> `SUM(expr) + scalar*COUNT(expr)` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite `SUM(expr + scalar)` --> `SUM(expr) + scalar*COUNT(expr)` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite `SUM(expr + scalar)` --> `SUM(expr) + scalar*COUNT(expr)` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite `SUM(expr + scalar)` --> `SUM(expr) + scalar*COUNT(expr)` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite `SUM(expr + scalar)` --> `SUM(expr) + scalar*COUNT(expr)` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite `SUM(expr + scalar)` --> `SUM(expr) + scalar*COUNT(expr)` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite `SUM(expr + scalar)` --> `SUM(expr) + scalar*COUNT(expr)` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite `SUM(expr + scalar)` --> `SUM(expr) + scalar*COUNT(expr)` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite `SUM(expr + scalar)` --> `SUM(expr) + scalar*COUNT(expr)` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite `SUM(expr + scalar)` --> `SUM(expr) + scalar*COUNT(expr)` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite `SUM(expr + scalar)` --> `SUM(expr) + scalar*COUNT(expr)` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite `SUM(expr + scalar)` --> `SUM(expr) + scalar*COUNT(expr)` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite `SUM(expr + scalar)` --> `SUM(expr) + scalar*COUNT(expr)` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rewrite `SUM(expr + scalar)` --> `SUM(expr) + scalar*COUNT(expr)` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Optimize Clickbench Query 29 by adding a new Optimizer rule [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize Clickbench Query 29 by adding a new Optimizer rule [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Mark expressions with known correctness issues as incompatible [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Mark expressions with known correctness issues as incompatible [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Mark expressions with known correctness issues as incompatible [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Mark expressions with known correctness issues as incompatible [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Mark expressions with known correctness issues as incompatible [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Incorrect ORDER BY in unparser after DF 52 upgrade [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect ORDER BY in unparser after DF 52 upgrade [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] bug: regexp simplify optimization incorrect simplifies `.*` pattern to `Eq ""` operation [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: Reduce allocations for aggregating `Statistics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Reduce allocations for aggregating `Statistics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Reduce allocations for aggregating `Statistics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Reduce allocations for aggregating `Statistics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Reduce allocations for aggregating `Statistics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Reduce allocations for aggregating `Statistics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Reduce allocations for aggregating `Statistics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Reduce allocations for aggregating `Statistics` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Reduce allocations for aggregating `Statistics` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: estimate cardinality for semi and anti-joins using distinct counts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: estimate cardinality for semi and anti-joins using distinct counts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: estimate cardinality for semi and anti-joins using distinct counts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: estimate cardinality for semi and anti-joins using distinct counts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: estimate cardinality for semi and anti-joins using distinct counts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: estimate cardinality for semi and anti-joins using distinct counts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: estimate cardinality for semi and anti-joins using distinct counts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: estimate cardinality for semi and anti-joins using distinct counts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: estimate cardinality for semi and anti-joins using distinct counts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: estimate cardinality for semi and anti-joins using distinct counts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: estimate cardinality for semi and anti-joins using distinct counts [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: implement Spark-compatible null handling for arrays_overlap [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] [branch-53] fix: do not recompute hash join exec properties if not required (#20900) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-53] fix: do not recompute hash join exec properties if not required (#20900) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-53] fix: do not recompute hash join exec properties if not required (#20900) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-53] fix: do not recompute hash join exec properties if not required (#20900) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-53] fix: do not recompute hash join exec properties if not required (#20900) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-53] fix: do not recompute hash join exec properties if not required (#20900) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-53] fix: do not recompute hash join exec properties if not required (#20900) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-53] fix: do not recompute hash join exec properties if not required (#20900) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-53] fix: do not recompute hash join exec properties if not required (#20900) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-53] fix: do not recompute hash join exec properties if not required (#20900) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [main] Bump to 52.3.0 and changelog (#20790) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] `array_overlap` correctness issue [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Proposal: Remove CometFuzz module [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Proposal: Remove CometFuzz module [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Proposal: Remove CometFuzz module [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Proposal: Remove CometFuzz module [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Proposal: Remove CometFuzz module [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Proposal: Remove CometFuzz module [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Proposal: Remove CometFuzz module [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Proposal: Remove CometFuzz module [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add benchmark automation code to the repo [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add benchmark automation code to the repo [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Future of Iceberg Support in Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Future of Iceberg Support in Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Future of Iceberg Support in Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Future of Iceberg Support in Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Future of Iceberg Support in Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Future of Iceberg Support in Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: remove Java Iceberg integration tests from CI [iceberg] [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: remove Java Iceberg integration tests from CI [iceberg] [datafusion-comet] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages