github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `54.0.0` (Apr 2026 / May 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] minor: code cleanup and log level changes [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: code cleanup and log level changes [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: code cleanup and log level changes [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: Handle potential overflow in internal state for `avg(decimal)` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Handle potential overflow in internal state for `avg(decimal)` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Handle potential overflow in internal state for `avg(decimal)` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Handle potential overflow in internal state for `avg(decimal)` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Decimal average can overflow because its inner intermediate sum state overflows its storage size [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Decimal average can overflow because its inner intermediate sum state overflows its storage size [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Replace CORS env vars with config properties [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Replace CORS env vars with config properties [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Recursive CTE Nullability Handling Should Preserve Logical Schema Without Requiring SQL Rewrites [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: Correctly compute nullability in recursive CTE schemas [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Refactor: Centralize numeric `%c` formatting dispatch in format_string.rs [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Refactor Spark `format_string` integer conversion dispatch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor Spark `format_string` integer conversion dispatch [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Unify LRU memory-limiting caches into one generic cache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unify LRU memory-limiting caches into one generic cache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unify LRU memory-limiting caches into one generic cache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unify LRU memory-limiting caches into one generic cache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unify LRU memory-limiting caches into one generic cache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unify LRU memory-limiting caches into one generic cache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unify LRU memory-limiting caches into one generic cache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unify LRU memory-limiting caches into one generic cache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unify LRU memory-limiting caches into one generic cache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unify LRU memory-limiting caches into one generic cache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unify LRU memory-limiting caches into one generic cache [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unify LRU memory-limiting caches into one generic cache [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] `stats_cartesian_product` computes incorrect byte size for cross join [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: correct cross join byte size statistics [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] how does ballista multimodal capabolities compare to daft ? [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] how does ballista multimodal capabolities compare to daft ? [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] how does ballista multimodal capabolities compare to daft ? [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: speed up primitive group value interning, use less memory [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Align grouped `first_value`/`last_value` FILTER handling with shared `Some(true)` semantics [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat(aqe): chaos monkey testing for ballista execution [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(aqe): chaos monkey testing for ballista execution [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • [PR] feat(aqe): chaos monkey testing for ballista execution [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(aqe): chaos monkey testing for ballista execution [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(aqe): chaos monkey testing for ballista execution [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(aqe): chaos monkey testing for ballista execution [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(aqe): chaos monkey testing for ballista execution [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(aqe): chaos monkey testing for ballista execution [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(aqe): chaos monkey testing for ballista execution [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(aqe): chaos monkey testing for ballista execution [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [I] panic: array_repeat scalar path overflows total repeated-value count [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: Add web rendering of the TUI application [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add web rendering of the TUI application [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add web rendering of the TUI application [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add web rendering of the TUI application [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add web rendering of the TUI application [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add web rendering of the TUI application [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add web rendering of the TUI application [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add web rendering of the TUI application [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add web rendering of the TUI application [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add web rendering of the TUI application [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add web rendering of the TUI application [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix array_repeat scalar path overflows total repeated-value count [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix array_repeat scalar path overflows total repeated-value count [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: align regexp_instr empty pattern [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Fixed blocks in aggregation state for better memory management [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PoC: Blocked state management for hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: avoid unnecessary large allocations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid unnecessary large allocations [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(ci): Drop Windows CI runs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(ci): Drop Windows CI runs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(ci): Drop Windows CI runs [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] Mark BufferExec and AnalyzeExec as eager [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Mark BufferExec and AnalyzeExec as eager [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Mark BufferExec and AnalyzeExec as eager [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Mark BufferExec and AnalyzeExec as eager [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Mark BufferExec and AnalyzeExec as eager [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Mark BufferExec and AnalyzeExec as eager [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] PushDownLeafProjections error with Unnest nodes [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: make PushDownLeafProjections work with unnest [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Split Aggregation Logic into Dedicated Streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Split Aggregation Logic into Dedicated Streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Split Aggregation Logic into Dedicated Streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Split Aggregation Logic into Dedicated Streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Split Aggregation Logic into Dedicated Streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Split Aggregation Logic into Dedicated Streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Split Aggregation Logic into Dedicated Streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Split Aggregation Logic into Dedicated Streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Split Aggregation Logic into Dedicated Streams [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Split Aggregation Logic into Dedicated Streams [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Be able to cast struct to have non-nullable inner field [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Be able to cast struct to have non-nullable inner field [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] BufferExec and AnalyzeExec should report eager evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] BufferExec and AnalyzeExec should report eager evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] BufferExec and AnalyzeExec should report eager evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] BufferExec and AnalyzeExec should report eager evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] BufferExec and AnalyzeExec should report eager evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Convert inner joins to semi joins when equivalent [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] perf(optimizer): EliminateCrossJoin walks the full plan tree even when there are no joins [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [EPIC] Full lambda support [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Preserve integer values in round() for large Int64 and UInt64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages