schenksj opened a new issue, #5390:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/5390

   Follow-up from review of #4952 ([tracking 
comment](https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/4366#issuecomment-5320446796),
 item 3).
   
   ### What is pinned today
   
   The `contrib-delta` Maven profile pins a `delta-spark` version per Spark 
profile, in `spark/pom.xml`:
   
   | Spark profile | `delta.version` |
   |---|---|
   | spark-3.5 | 3.3.2 |
   | spark-4.0 | 4.0.0 |
   | spark-4.1 | 4.1.0 |
   
   with a top-level default of `4.1.0` in the root `pom.xml`. 
`dev/verify-contrib-delta-gate.sh`
   asserts the mapping holds (spark-4.1 -> delta-spark 4.1.x, spark-3.5 -> 3.x, 
spark-4.0 -> 4.0.x)
   and fails the build gate otherwise.
   
   ### The gap
   
   The pin is a real compatibility decision — the contrib reflects into 
delta-spark internals
   (`TahoeLogFileIndex`, `PreparedDeltaFileIndex`, `TahoeBatchFileIndex`, DV 
plumbing), so the
   supported range is narrower than "any delta-spark". But that decision is 
currently only implicit
   in the poms plus an assertion in the gate script. There is no issue 
recording:
   
   - **which** delta-spark versions the contrib claims to support, and why 
those;
   - **what a user should expect** if they run against a different delta-spark 
than the pinned one;
   - **who updates the pin** when a new delta-spark ships, and what has to be 
re-verified (the
     reflection surface is the risky part, not the wire format);
   - whether the per-Spark mapping should ever become a **range** rather than 
an exact pin.
   
   ### Ask
   
   Settle the policy and write it down — in the contrib user guide and/or the 
profile comments — and
   keep the gate script assertion as the enforcement. This is a 
documentation/decision issue rather
   than a code change; the current pins work.
   
   ---
   🤖 Filed with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code).


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to