alamb commented on PR #12027: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/12027#issuecomment-2308791022
> The StringArrays may be the nicest API wise but it does incur unavoidable overhead for anything but .iter() (or at least I couldn't find a way to make that approach faster). I would say that for StringArrayType should be used in DataFusion for most use cases except where one would want specialized handling or it to be object safe (which that trait can't be). 👍 > I'll have another go at the to_timestamp UDF using the StringArrayType approach but I suspect I may need to refactor it quite a bit to make that work. Hopefully I'll have a pull request next week for that. Thank you very much. I look forward to it -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
