github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [I] AsyncScalarUDFs break when batch_size doesn't divide number of rows [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Update to datafusion 51 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Update to datafusion 51 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Update to datafusion 51 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Update to datafusion 51 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [I] Some configs do not get passed to native [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Some configs do not get passed to native [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Guarantees [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move `GuaranteeRewriter` to datafusion_expr [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] [WIP] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` 57.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [WIP] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` 57.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [WIP] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` 57.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [WIP] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` 57.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [WIP] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` 57.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [WIP] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` 57.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [WIP] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` 57.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [WIP] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` 57.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [WIP] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` 57.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [WIP] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` 57.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [WIP] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` 57.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` to `57.1.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` to `57.1.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` to `57.1.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` to `57.1.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` to `57.1.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` to `57.1.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` to `57.1.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` to `57.1.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` to `57.1.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update to `arrow`, `parquet` to `57.1.0` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Panic when cast from `DATE` to `TIMESTAMP` overflows [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] test1 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test1 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix async_udf batch size behaviour [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix async_udf batch size behaviour [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix async_udf batch size behaviour [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix async_udf batch size behaviour [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix async_udf batch size behaviour [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix async_udf batch size behaviour [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix async_udf batch size behaviour [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix async_udf batch size behaviour [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix async_udf batch size behaviour [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Enabling `expand_views_at_output` config changes column names [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Draft Reverse parquet [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support reverse parquet scan and fast parquet order inversion at row group level [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Full join on dataframe with only index yields dropped rows [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.62.47 to 2.62.54 [datafusion-sandbox] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.62.47 to 2.62.54 [datafusion-sandbox] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.62.47 to 2.62.54 [datafusion-sandbox] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.62.47 to 2.62.54 [datafusion-sandbox] via GitHub
• Re: [D] Indexing Support in DataFusion? [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Indexing Support in DataFusion? [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Indexing Support in DataFusion? [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Bug: unnecessary columns projected and redundant filters pushed down [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Bug: unnecessary columns projected and redundant filters pushed down [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Bug: unnecessary columns projected and redundant filters pushed down [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Dameng DATETIME WITH TIME ZONE not supported [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.62.53 to 2.62.54 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.62.53 to 2.62.54 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [substrait] [sqllogictest] Error during planning: No table named 'generate_series()' [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [substrait] [sqllogictest] Unsupported producing row from empty relation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [substrait] [sqllogictest] Unsupported producing row from empty relation [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [substrait] [sqllogictest] Unsupported plan type: RecursiveQuery [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [substrait] [sqllogictest] Unsupported plan type: RecursiveQuery [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [substrait] [sqllogictest] Error during planning: No table named 'tmp_table' [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [substrait] [sqllogictest] Substrait schema timestamp field mismatch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [substrait] [sqllogictest] Substrait schema timestamp field mismatch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [substrait] [sqllogictest] Substrait schema timestamp field mismatch [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add support for `MapFromEntries` [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix Schema Duplication Errors in Self‑Referential INTERSECT/EXCEPT by Requalifying Input Sides [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Schema Duplication Errors in Self‑Referential INTERSECT/EXCEPT by Requalifying Input Sides [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Schema Duplication Errors in Self‑Referential INTERSECT/EXCEPT by Requalifying Input Sides [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Schema Duplication Errors in Self‑Referential INTERSECT/EXCEPT by Requalifying Input Sides [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Schema Duplication Errors in Self‑Referential INTERSECT/EXCEPT by Requalifying Input Sides [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Schema Duplication Errors in Self‑Referential INTERSECT/EXCEPT by Requalifying Input Sides [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Schema Duplication Errors in Self‑Referential INTERSECT/EXCEPT by Requalifying Input Sides [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add support for `GO` batch delimiter in SQL Server [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for `GO` batch delimiter in SQL Server [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Expand parse without semicolons [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expand parse without semicolons [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expand parse without semicolons [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [I] chore: Modify prerelease process to protect automatically RC branch [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Push down InList or hash table references from HashJoinExec depending on the size of the build side [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Redesign protobuf encode/decode hooks & state [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Redesign protobuf encode/decode hooks & state [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] DRAFT implement trait in proto de/serialization to allow finer control [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT implement trait in proto de/serialization to allow finer control [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT implement trait in proto de/serialization to allow finer control [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT implement trait in proto de/serialization to allow finer control [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT implement trait in proto de/serialization to allow finer control [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT implement trait in proto de/serialization to allow finer control [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT implement trait in proto de/serialization to allow finer control [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT implement trait in proto de/serialization to allow finer control [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT implement trait in proto de/serialization to allow finer control [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT implement trait in proto de/serialization to allow finer control [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT implement trait in proto de/serialization to allow finer control [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT implement trait in proto de/serialization to allow finer control [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT implement trait in proto de/serialization to allow finer control [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT implement trait in proto de/serialization to allow finer control [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT implement trait in proto de/serialization to allow finer control [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Support Ref types in Scan [Avro] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Ref types in Scan [Avro] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Ref types in Scan [Avro] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Ref types in Scan [Avro] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Ref types in Scan [Avro] [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Support Ref types in Avro Reader. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support Ref types in Avro Reader. [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support Ref types in Avro Reader. [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: Support Show runtime settings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Show runtime settings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Show runtime settings [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Show runtime settings [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Improve Avro Reader Types Support [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve Avro Reader Types Support [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve Avro Reader Types Support [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve Avro Reader Types Support [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore: apply cargo fmt with import organization [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Improve read types support [Avro] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Improve read types support [Avro] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Improve read types support [Avro] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Improve read types support [Avro] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Improve read types support [Avro] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Improve read types support [Avro] [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Improve read types support [Avro] [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] WIP: using arrow-avro. remove own implementation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: using arrow-avro. remove own implementation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: using arrow-avro. remove own implementation [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages