LinSimon-901101 opened a new issue, #6378:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/6378

   ### What is the problem the feature request solves?
   
   ### What is the problem the feature request solves?
   
   Follow-up to #6262.
   
   The predicates in `CometInMemoryCachePruningSuite` do not directly test 
integer min/max boundaries. The selected IDs in `id IN (1, 9, 49)` fall inside 
their batches, while `n IS NULL` checks null counts. As a result, an integer 
upper bound that is one too small can go undetected by this suite.
   
   ### Describe the potential solution
   
   Add `n = 5` to the shared predicate list. In the existing fixture, the 
matching batch contains only `n = 5`, so this predicate exercises both its 
lower and upper bounds.
   
   Verify all three writer paths: native Arrow, Spark columnar, and row input. 
Keep the independent expected-result and pruning assertions. With the current 
fixture, the predicate should return IDs 20–23 and retain one four-row batch.
   
   ### Additional context
   
   Suggested during review of #6262:
   https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/6262#discussion_r4128060318
   
   Related original issue: #6203.
   
   ### Describe the potential solution
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Additional context
   
   _No response_


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to