github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] chore: Add more tests with `GROUP BY` to test spark `collect_set` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: fix decimal div and add tests [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fix decimal div and add tests [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: suppress nondeterministic metrics in agg_dyn_e2e sqllogictest [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: suppress nondeterministic metrics in agg_dyn_e2e sqllogictest [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: suppress nondeterministic metrics in agg_dyn_e2e sqllogictest [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: suppress nondeterministic metrics in agg_dyn_e2e sqllogictest [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: suppress nondeterministic metrics in agg_dyn_e2e sqllogictest [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: breakdown `array.slt` into smaller files [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: breakdown `array.slt` into smaller files [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: breakdown `array.slt` into smaller files [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Support `collect_set` built in function [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support `collect_set` built in function [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] pin apache/infrastructure-actions/pelican to 93dfe4693bc118397840e7e4ae447e57a3eea7ee [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] pin apache/infrastructure-actions/pelican to 93dfe4693bc118397840e7e4ae447e57a3eea7ee [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] pin apache/infrastructure-actions/pelican to 93dfe4693bc118397840e7e4ae447e57a3eea7ee [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] pin apache/infrastructure-actions/pelican to 93dfe4693bc118397840e7e4ae447e57a3eea7ee [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] pin apache/infrastructure-actions/pelican to 93dfe4693bc118397840e7e4ae447e57a3eea7ee [datafusion-site] via GitHub
• [I] Dependencies CI check is failing on main [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Dependencies CI check is failing on main [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] fuzz test failure: `corr` null vs Nan [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: fix cargo audit on main [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: fix cargo audit and dependencies check on main [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: fix cargo audit and dependencies check on main [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: fix cargo audit and dependencies check on main [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: fix cargo audit and dependencies check on main [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: fix cargo audit and dependencies check on main [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: fix cargo audit and dependencies check on main [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: move shuffle writer disk I/O off tokio worker threads [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: move shuffle writer disk I/O off tokio worker threads [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: move shuffle writer disk I/O off tokio worker threads [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: move shuffle writer disk I/O off tokio worker threads [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: move shuffle writer disk I/O off tokio worker threads [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: move shuffle writer disk I/O off tokio worker threads [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: move shuffle writer disk I/O off tokio worker threads [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: move shuffle writer disk I/O off tokio worker threads [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: move shuffle writer disk I/O off tokio worker threads [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: move shuffle writer disk I/O off tokio worker threads [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: move shuffle writer disk I/O off tokio worker threads [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: move shuffle writer disk I/O off tokio worker threads [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: move shuffle writer disk I/O off tokio worker threads [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use NDV estimate to pre-allocate hash tables during aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Add support for Spark SQL dialect [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add support for Spark SQL dialect [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] cargo audit is failing on main [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] cargo audit is failing on main [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Resolve MIN/MAX from Parquet metadata for Single-mode aggregates and CAST projections [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Resolve MIN/MAX from Parquet metadata for Single-mode aggregates and CAST projections [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Resolve MIN/MAX from Parquet metadata for Single-mode aggregates and CAST projections [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Resolve MIN/MAX from Parquet metadata for Single-mode aggregates and CAST projections [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Resolve MIN/MAX from Parquet metadata for Single-mode aggregates and CAST projections [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Resolve MIN/MAX from Parquet metadata for Single-mode aggregates and CAST projections [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Resolve MIN/MAX from Parquet metadata for Single-mode aggregates and CAST projections [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Resolve MIN/MAX from Parquet metadata for Single-mode aggregates and CAST projections [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Resolve MIN/MAX from Parquet metadata for Single-mode aggregates and CAST projections [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Resolve MIN/MAX from Parquet metadata for Single-mode aggregates and CAST projections [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Resolve MIN/MAX from Parquet metadata for Single-mode aggregates and CAST projections [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Resolve MIN/MAX from Parquet metadata for Single-mode aggregates and CAST projections [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Resolve MIN/MAX from Parquet metadata for Single-mode aggregates and CAST projections [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Resolve MIN/MAX from Parquet metadata for Single-mode aggregates and CAST projections [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Resolve MIN/MAX from Parquet metadata for Single-mode aggregates and CAST projections [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] [DISCUSS] Representing Shared State / `ExecutionPlan::reset_state` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Representing Shared State / `ExecutionPlan::reset_state` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Representing Shared State / `ExecutionPlan::reset_state` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Representing Shared State / `ExecutionPlan::reset_state` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Representing Shared State / `ExecutionPlan::reset_state` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Representing Shared State / `ExecutionPlan::reset_state` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Representing Shared State / `ExecutionPlan::reset_state` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Representing Shared State / `ExecutionPlan::reset_state` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Representing Shared State / `ExecutionPlan::reset_state` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Representing Shared State / `ExecutionPlan::reset_state` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Representing Shared State / `ExecutionPlan::reset_state` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Representing Shared State / `ExecutionPlan::reset_state` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Representing Shared State / `ExecutionPlan::reset_state` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Refactor InListExpr to use modular StaticFilter architecture [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor InListExpr to use modular StaticFilter architecture [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor InListExpr to use modular StaticFilter architecture [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor InListExpr to use modular StaticFilter architecture [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor InListExpr to use modular StaticFilter architecture [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor InListExpr to use modular StaticFilter architecture [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor InListExpr into static-filter modules [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor InListExpr into static-filter modules [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor InListExpr into static-filter modules [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor InListExpr into static-filter modules [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor InListExpr into static-filter modules [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor InListExpr into static-filter modules [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor InListExpr into static-filter modules [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Add strategy-focused InList benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add strategy-focused InList benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add strategy-focused InList benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add strategy-focused InList benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add strategy-focused InList benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Spark SQL: Add SparkSqlDialect [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Spark SQL: Add SparkSqlDialect [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Spark SQL: Add SparkSqlDialect [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Spark SQL: Add SparkSqlDialect [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Query execution time difference between deltatable QueryBuilder and using DataFusion directly. [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Query execution time difference between deltatable QueryBuilder and using DataFusion directly. [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Feature] Support Spark expression: date_from_unix_date [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Support arithmetic expressions in PruningPredicate for Parquet row gr… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support arithmetic expressions in PruningPredicate for Parquet row gr… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support arithmetic expressions in PruningPredicate for Parquet row gr… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support arithmetic expressions in PruningPredicate for Parquet row gr… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support arithmetic expressions in PruningPredicate for Parquet row gr… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support arithmetic expressions in PruningPredicate for Parquet row gr… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support arithmetic expressions in PruningPredicate for Parquet row gr… [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Changelog generator does not work for minor releases [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(optimizer): preserve filter execution order in PushDownFilter [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add release management page to the documentation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add release management page to the documentation [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] A few TPCH benchmark queries are incorrect causing issues when scale factor > 1 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Regression in json performance for local files [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] PostgreSQL: Add support for LATERAL ... WITH ORDINALITY [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PostgreSQL: Add support for LATERAL ... WITH ORDINALITY [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [I] chore: Break down `array.slt` into smaller files [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] chore: Break down `array.slt` into smaller files [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: add April 2026 readings and meetup links [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add April 2026 readings and meetup links [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add April 2026 readings and meetup links [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add April 2026 readings and meetup links [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Actually preserve predicate execution order in PushDownFilter [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Actually preserve predicate execution order in PushDownFilter [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Actually preserve predicate execution order in PushDownFilter [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Actually preserve predicate execution order in PushDownFilter [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Actually preserve predicate execution order in PushDownFilter [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] PushDownFilter claims to be preserving predicate order but in fact reverses it [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] PushDownFilter claims to be preserving predicate order but in fact reverses it [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] PushDownFilter claims to be preserving predicate order but in fact reverses it [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] PushDownFilter claims to be preserving predicate order but in fact reverses it [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: remove barrier from SharedBuildAccumulator to resolve Q18 deadlock [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Add AGENTS.md and enrich package docstring [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AGENTS.md and enrich package docstring [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AGENTS.md and enrich package docstring [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AGENTS.md and enrich package docstring [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: ExecutionEngine::create_query_stage_exec accepts partition_id [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: ExecutionEngine::create_query_stage_exec accepts partition_id [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Make it easier for agents to generate datafusion-python code [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: Add documentation or running spark-sql-perf [WIP] [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Redshift: PartiQL AT <index> [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redshift: PartiQL AT <index> [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redshift: PartiQL AT <index> [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: morsel splitting in SharedWorkSource [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test: morsel splitting in SharedWorkSource [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test: morsel splitting in SharedWorkSource [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages