github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] feat: add native implementations of `regexp_extract` and `regexp_extract_all` [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] SIMILAR TO panics ('failed to downcast array') when operand types differ (e.g. NULL pattern, Utf8View vs Utf8) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] perf: Extend WindowTopN to support RANK [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Extend WindowTopN to support RANK [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] AbstractMethodError: CometBroadcastExchangeExec missing sparkContext() from BroadcastExchangeLike [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] CometNativeException: "arrays of different length" when using to_date on Iceberg Timestamp column [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] CometNativeException: "arrays of different length" when using to_date on Iceberg Timestamp column [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: link to 2026 Q3-Q4 roadmap discussion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: link to 2026 Q3-Q4 roadmap discussion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: link to 2026 Q3-Q4 roadmap discussion [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [Tracking] feat(contrib): Native Delta Lake scan via delta-kernel-rs (Iceberg-style contrib) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Adaptive predicate evaluation [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Proposal] Streaming execution support roadmap [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [Proposal] Streaming execution support roadmap [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [D] Q2 2026 roadmap planning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Q2 2026 roadmap planning [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] [DISCUSSION] 2026 Q3-Q4 Roadmap Discussion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] 2026 Q3-Q4 Roadmap Discussion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] 2026 Q3-Q4 Roadmap Discussion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] 2026 Q3-Q4 Roadmap Discussion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] 2026 Q3-Q4 Roadmap Discussion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] 2026 Q3-Q4 Roadmap Discussion [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: route structured-text functions through codegen dispatcher [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: route structured-text functions through codegen dispatcher [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: route structured-text functions through codegen dispatcher [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: route structured-text functions through codegen dispatcher [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Route structured-text functions (CSV/JSON/XPath/XML) through the codegen dispatcher [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Route structured-text functions (CSV/JSON/XPath/XML) through the codegen dispatcher [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] RIGHT/FULL/NATURAL JOIN ... USING(k) does not coalesce the join key (returns NULL for right-only rows) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Optimize mark joins using existence probes [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize mark joins using existence probes [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Add Poll::Pending spill stream test coverage for SMJ async spill paths [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add Poll::Pending spill stream test coverage for SMJ async spill paths [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add Poll::Pending spill stream test coverage for SMJ async spill paths [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: route higher-order functions through codegen dispatcher [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: route higher-order functions through codegen dispatcher [experimental / WIP] [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: route higher-order functions through codegen dispatcher [experimental / WIP] [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: route higher-order functions through codegen dispatcher [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: route higher-order functions through codegen dispatcher [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Route array/map higher-order (lambda) functions through the codegen dispatcher [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Route array/map higher-order (lambda) functions through the codegen dispatcher [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(sort): record output_batches, output_bytes and end_time for when not using merge sort [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: add array_exists with lambda support via CometUDF framework [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add array_exists with lambda support via CometUDF framework [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: add initial support for `array_exists` with lambda expression support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add initial support for `array_exists` with lambda expression support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Optimize semi, anti-joins to avoid dynamic dispatch for comparison [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize semi, anti-joins to avoid dynamic dispatch for comparison [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize semi, anti-joins to avoid dynamic dispatch for comparison [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize semi, anti-joins to avoid dynamic dispatch for comparison [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize semi, anti-joins to avoid dynamic dispatch for comparison [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize semi, anti-joins to avoid dynamic dispatch for comparison [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Feat/table provider ffi [datafusion-java] via GitHub
• [I] Test dual-impl (native + codegen-dispatch) expressions consistently across the full routing matrix [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] [Migration] Branch 54 test [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Migration] Branch 54 test [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Migration] Branch 54 test [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Hash join should omit NULLs from build side under `NullEqualsNothing` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Hash join should omit NULLs from build side under `NullEqualsNothing` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] TopK early-exit doesn't fire when a partition's local heap is empty but the shared dynamic filter is already tight [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Propagation of metadata through casts can strips extension type from the destination field and can result in invalid extension types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Propagation of metadata through casts can strips extension type from the destination field and can result in invalid extension types [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: RIGHT/FULL/NATURAL JOIN USING does not coalesce the join key (returns NULL for right-only rows) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] breaking change detector in CI report breaking changes when HEAD is not aligned with base branch [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: use internal_err macro in `assert_eq_or_internal_err` for backtrace [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: add backtrace for `assert_*_or_internal_err` helpers [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: add backtrace for `assert_*_or_internal_err` helpers [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: add backtrace for `assert_*_or_internal_err` helpers [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: add backtrace for `assert_*_or_internal_err` helpers [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: add backtrace for `assert_*_or_internal_err` helpers [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: move TopK user defined operator example into extending-operators guide [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: move TopK user defined operator example into extending-operators guide [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: move TopK user defined operator example into extending-operators guide [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: move TopK user defined operator example into extending-operators guide [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] IGNORE debug breaking change ci [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IGNORE debug breaking change ci [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Refactor outer join null-rejection analysis to track join sides directly [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat(parquet): runtime row-group early stop via TopK dynamic filter [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(parquet): runtime row-group early stop via TopK dynamic filter [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Optimizer] Consolidate repeated filter-rebuild patterns in PushDownFilter [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Refactor unary filter pushdown logic for Aggregate and Window [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Centralize checked byte-size and offset accounting for variable-size string builders [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Centralize checked byte-size and offset accounting for variable-size string builders [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Refactor eliminate_outer_join null-rejection analysis to track join sides directly [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Refactor eliminate_outer_join null-rejection analysis to track join sides directly [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Centralize shared-allocation accounting for Arc DFHeapSize implementations [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Clearly gate sliding SUM(DISTINCT) type support [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clearly gate sliding SUM(DISTINCT) type support [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Draft: implement non-blocking morsel API [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Draft: implement non-blocking morsel API [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump uuid from 1.23.2 to 1.23.3 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump uuid from 1.23.2 to 1.23.3 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.81.8 to 2.81.9 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.81.8 to 2.81.9 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: allow EvalMode.TRY in CometRemainder to support try_mod [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: allow EvalMode.TRY in CometRemainder to support try_mod [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Bug] try_mod falls back to Spark because CometRemainder rejects EvalMode.TRY [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [Bug] try_mod falls back to Spark because CometRemainder rejects EvalMode.TRY [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat(cli): implement mmap based object store for local files [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat(parquet): support CDC chunking options [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Enable logical planning for `UPDATE ... FROM` and preserve joined assignment qualifiers [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enable logical planning for `UPDATE ... FROM` and preserve joined assignment qualifiers [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] refactor: introduce ProbeEnd state in NestedLoopJoinExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: introduce ProbeEnd state in NestedLoopJoinExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: introduce ProbeEnd state in NestedLoopJoinExec [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] chore: do not run code CI for documentation only PRs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] chore: do not run code CI for documentation only PRs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] chore: do not run code CI for documentation only PRs [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] DataFusionError should be MECE [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] DataFusionError should be MECE [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: count shared buffers once in hash join build-side memory accounting [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Accurately reserve memory in the build side of hash joins [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Accurately reserve memory in the build side of hash joins [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: decouple partition's location from executor's metadata [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: decouple partition location from executor metadata [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: decouple partition location from executor metadata [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] Revert custom allocator auditing of MemoryPool tracking in SLTs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert custom allocator auditing of MemoryPool tracking in SLTs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert custom allocator auditing of MemoryPool tracking in SLTs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert custom allocator auditing of MemoryPool tracking in SLTs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert custom allocator auditing of MemoryPool tracking in SLTs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert custom allocator auditing of MemoryPool tracking in SLTs [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: Native Parquet Iceberg Data File Writes In Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Rich t kid/multi dictionary benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rich t kid/multi dictionary benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rich t kid/multi dictionary benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rich t kid/multi dictionary benchmarks [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Parser: fix exponential parse time on table-factor paren chains [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test performance of `BatchCoalescer::push_batch_with_filter` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Skip loading Parquet page index when row-group statistics already prove it cannot prune [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip loading Parquet page index when row-group statistics already prove it cannot prune [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip loading Parquet page index when row-group statistics already prove it cannot prune [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip loading Parquet page index when row-group statistics already prove it cannot prune [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip loading Parquet page index when row-group statistics already prove it cannot prune [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip loading Parquet page index when row-group statistics already prove it cannot prune [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip loading Parquet page index when row-group statistics already prove it cannot prune [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip loading Parquet page index when row-group statistics already prove it cannot prune [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps-dev): bump shell-quote from 1.8.3 to 1.8.4 in /datafusion/wasmtest/datafusion-wasm-app [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps-dev): bump shell-quote from 1.8.3 to 1.8.4 in /datafusion/wasmtest/datafusion-wasm-app [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Revisit the case for native columnar-to-row? [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Revisit the case for native columnar-to-row? [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Revisit the case for native columnar-to-row? [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] [main] Update version and changelog to 54.0.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [main] Update version and changelog to 54.0.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [main] Update version and changelog to 54.0.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NewType pattern for `job_id` and `job_name` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages