raghavyadav01 commented on PR #26842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/26842#issuecomment-6805194983

   Ran the decorrelation corpus from #26904 (57 queries) on this branch 
(e0677c4d8) and on its merge base 888879d01c, against DuckDB 1.5.6.
   
   - 9 go from an error or wrong rows to DuckDB's answer: #26234, #26692 (q1), 
#26573, #25837, #26033, #21727, #15558, and two shapes from the #5492 catalog 
that aren't in your table, `exists_depth_2_correlation_skipping_a_level` and 
`exists_in_inner_join_on_reading_both_inputs`
   - 2 still fail, now with `Physical plan does not support logical expression 
Exists` instead of a schema error: 
`exists_in_scalar_subquery_correlated_to_both_levels`, 
`exists_over_correlated_unnest`
   - none got worse; the other 46 give the same output on both
   
   So the binding part clears a whole group of the open decorrelation issues 
without changing the rest.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to