kczimm commented on code in PR #15980:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15980#discussion_r2080118522
##########
datafusion/expr/src/logical_plan/plan.rs:
##########
@@ -1494,6 +1494,14 @@ impl LogicalPlan {
let mut param_types: HashMap<String, Option<DataType>> =
HashMap::new();
self.apply_with_subqueries(|plan| {
+ if let LogicalPlan::Limit(Limit { fetch: Some(e), .. }) = plan {
Review Comment:
My test is actually really unfair, I will modify it. I constructed
`LogicalPlan` by hand and gave it no opportunity to do any placeholder type
inference.
`Expr::infer_placeholder_types` takes an `Expr` and a `DFSchema` and it uses
the schema to infer the datatype from the field type. However, there is no
schema that will provide that information for `LIMIT`. It's a special case and
we (I believe) always know what datatype it must be and it need not be
inferred. I think the case is the same for `offset` as you mention. In fact, it
looks like we try to coerce it to be Int64,
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/blob/41e7aed3a943134c40d1b18cb9d424b358b5e5b1/datafusion/optimizer/src/analyzer/type_coercion.rs#L242.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
