github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] feat: run examples/*.py in CI and fix the examples that could not run [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: run examples/*.py in CI and fix the examples that could not run [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [I] push_down_filter and common_sub_expression_eliminate fight between them [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Scalar subquery (`Expr::ScalarSubquery`) does not fail when subquery is not scalar [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Scalar subquery (`Expr::ScalarSubquery`) does not fail when subquery is not scalar [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Postgres: Support XML functions (XMLELEMENT, XMLPI, XMLROOT, XMLSERIALIZE, XMLEXISTS) [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: preserve input ordering required by limits [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: blocked hash aggregation state via an independent address-resolve pass, with block-wise output release [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: blocked hash aggregation state via an independent address-resolve pass, with block-wise output release [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: blocked hash aggregation state via an independent address-resolve pass, with block-wise output release [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: blocked hash aggregation state via an independent address-resolve pass, with block-wise output release [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: blocked hash aggregation state via an independent address-resolve pass, with block-wise output release [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: blocked hash aggregation state via an independent address-resolve pass, with block-wise output release [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: Set comparison subqueries on the same table without an alias silently return 0 rows [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Set comparison subqueries on the same table without an alias silently return 0 rows [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump tokio from 1.52.3 to 1.53.1 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump tokio from 1.52.3 to 1.53.1 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump tokio from 1.52.3 to 1.53.1 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump arrow-select from 59.2.0 to 59.3.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump arrow-select from 59.2.0 to 59.3.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump arrow-select from 59.2.0 to 59.3.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump actions/checkout from 6 to 7 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump actions/checkout from 6 to 7 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump actions/checkout from 6 to 7 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump actions/cache from 5 to 6 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump actions/cache from 5 to 6 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump actions/cache from 5 to 6 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps-dev): bump setuptools from 82.0.1 to 83.0.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps-dev): bump setuptools from 82.0.1 to 83.0.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps-dev): bump setuptools from 82.0.1 to 83.0.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump serde_json from 1.0.150 to 1.0.151 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump serde_json from 1.0.150 to 1.0.151 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump serde_json from 1.0.150 to 1.0.151 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump quinn-proto from 0.11.14 to 0.11.16 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump quinn-proto from 0.11.14 to 0.11.16 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump quinn-proto from 0.11.14 to 0.11.16 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2 to 2.85.5 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2 to 2.85.5 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2 to 2.85.5 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump cryptography from 49.0.0 to 50.0.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump cryptography from 49.0.0 to 50.0.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump cryptography from 49.0.0 to 50.0.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump async-trait from 0.1.89 to 0.1.92 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump async-trait from 0.1.89 to 0.1.92 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump async-trait from 0.1.89 to 0.1.92 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump astral-sh/setup-uv from 8.2.0 to 10.0.1 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump astral-sh/setup-uv from 8.2.0 to 10.0.1 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump astral-sh/setup-uv from 8.2.0 to 10.0.1 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/analyze from 4.36.2 to 4.37.9 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/analyze from 4.36.2 to 4.37.9 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/analyze from 4.36.2 to 4.37.9 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/init from 4.36.2 to 4.37.9 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/init from 4.36.2 to 4.37.9 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/init from 4.36.2 to 4.37.9 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump tornado from 6.5.7 to 6.5.8 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump tornado from 6.5.7 to 6.5.8 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump tornado from 6.5.7 to 6.5.8 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump arrow-array from 59.2.0 to 59.3.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump arrow-array from 59.2.0 to 59.3.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump arrow-array from 59.2.0 to 59.3.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump futures from 0.3.32 to 0.3.34 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump futures from 0.3.32 to 0.3.34 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump futures from 0.3.32 to 0.3.34 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump arrow-schema from 59.2.0 to 59.3.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump arrow-schema from 59.2.0 to 59.3.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump arrow-schema from 59.2.0 to 59.3.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump arrow from 59.2.0 to 59.3.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump arrow from 59.2.0 to 59.3.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump arrow from 59.2.0 to 59.3.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump uuid from 1.23.3 to 1.26.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump uuid from 1.23.3 to 1.26.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump uuid from 1.23.3 to 1.26.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [EPIC] Use blocked / chunked memory management in hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Use blocked / chunked memory management in hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Use blocked / chunked memory management in hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Use blocked / chunked memory management in hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Use blocked / chunked memory management in hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Use blocked / chunked memory management in hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Use blocked / chunked memory management in hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Use blocked / chunked memory management in hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Use blocked / chunked memory management in hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Use blocked / chunked memory management in hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Use blocked / chunked memory management in hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Use blocked / chunked memory management in hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Use blocked / chunked memory management in hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Use blocked / chunked memory management in hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Use blocked / chunked memory management in hash aggregation [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] IN LIST: treat signed zeros as equal [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: treat signed zeros as equal [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: treat signed zeros as equal [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support ARRAY<STRING> in CometSparkToColumnarExec [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support ARRAY<STRING> in CometSparkToColumnarExec [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: Emit equality conditions for Substrait CASE base expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Emit equality conditions for Substrait CASE base expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Emit equality conditions for Substrait CASE base expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Emit equality conditions for Substrait CASE base expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Emit equality conditions for Substrait CASE base expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Emit equality conditions for Substrait CASE base expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Emit equality conditions for Substrait CASE base expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: avoid overflow and underflow in vector functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid overflow and underflow in vector functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid overflow and underflow in vector functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid overflow and underflow in vector functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid overflow and underflow in vector functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid overflow and underflow in vector functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid overflow and underflow in vector functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid overflow and underflow in vector functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid overflow and underflow in vector functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid overflow and underflow in vector functions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid overflow and underflow in vector functions [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] test: bound merge fan-in in ordered aggregate spill tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test: bound merge fan-in in ordered aggregate spill tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test: bound merge fan-in in ordered aggregate spill tests [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test: bound merge fan-in in ordered aggregate spill tests [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Postgres: allow reserved keywords as bare column alias [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: drop provably-true IS NOT NULL conjuncts from FilterExec predicates via input null_count statistics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: drop provably-true IS NOT NULL conjuncts from FilterExec predicates via input null_count statistics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: drop provably-true IS NOT NULL conjuncts from FilterExec predicates via input null_count statistics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: drop provably-true IS NOT NULL conjuncts from FilterExec predicates via input null_count statistics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: drop provably-true IS NOT NULL conjuncts from FilterExec predicates via input null_count statistics [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] INSERT can drop target Arrow extension metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: Optimize min(DISTINCT x) aggregations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Optimize min(DISTINCT x) aggregations [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: buffer the NestedLoopJoin build side as coalesced chunks instead of one concat_batches allocation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: buffer the NestedLoopJoin build side as coalesced chunks instead of one concat_batches allocation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: buffer the NestedLoopJoin build side as coalesced chunks instead of one concat_batches allocation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: buffer the NestedLoopJoin build side as coalesced chunks instead of one concat_batches allocation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: buffer the NestedLoopJoin build side as coalesced chunks instead of one concat_batches allocation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: buffer the NestedLoopJoin build side as coalesced chunks instead of one concat_batches allocation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: buffer the NestedLoopJoin build side as coalesced chunks instead of one concat_batches allocation [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: add `strictly_order_preserving` for more expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add `strictly_order_preserving` for more expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add `strictly_order_preserving` for more expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add `strictly_order_preserving` for more expr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add `strictly_order_preserving` for more expr [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: preserve short-circuit evaluation in Boolean CASE simplification [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve short-circuit evaluation in Boolean CASE simplification [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve short-circuit evaluation in Boolean CASE simplification [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: stabilize grouped correlation with centered moments [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stabilize grouped correlation with centered moments [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: avoid unsafe set rewrites for compound IN lists [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: avoid unsafe set rewrites for compound IN lists [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Snowflake: Parse structured OBJECT types [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Snowflake: Parse structured OBJECT types [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Snowflake: Parse structured OBJECT types [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Snowflake: Parse structured OBJECT types [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Snowflake: Parse structured OBJECT types [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Snowflake: Parse structured OBJECT types [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: reject NULL partition keys during partitioned writes [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: reject NULL partition keys during partitioned writes [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: Concretely typed TopK StringHeap, and StringHashTable slot reuse [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: return an error for an invalid CSV null_regex instead of panicking [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: return an error for an invalid CSV null_regex instead of panicking [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: return an error for an invalid CSV null_regex instead of panicking [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add aggregate-internal submetrics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add aggregate-internal submetrics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add aggregate-internal submetrics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add aggregate-internal submetrics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add aggregate-internal submetrics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add aggregate-internal submetrics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add aggregate-internal submetrics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add aggregate-internal submetrics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add aggregate-internal submetrics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add aggregate-internal submetrics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add aggregate-internal submetrics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add aggregate-internal submetrics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add aggregate-internal submetrics [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: make Parquet file schema type coercion work on nested schemas [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: make Parquet file schema type coercion work on nested schemas [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Support predicate subqueries in projections [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support predicate subqueries in projections [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix(physical-plan): CoalescePartitionsExec panic on wasm32-unknown-unknown [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(physical-plan): CoalescePartitionsExec panic on wasm32-unknown-unknown [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(physical-plan): CoalescePartitionsExec panic on wasm32-unknown-unknown [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(physical-plan): CoalescePartitionsExec panic on wasm32-unknown-unknown [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support multi-partitions when compiling DataFusion to `wasm` target [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] `UNION ALL` panics on `wasm32-unknown-unknown` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `UNION ALL` panics on `wasm32-unknown-unknown` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] test: cover array and map expression routing configurations [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test: cover array and map expression routing configurations [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test: cover array and map expression routing configurations [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] perf: spill every shuffle partition of a task into one file [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: spill every shuffle partition of a task into one file [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: spill every shuffle partition of a task into one file [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: spill every shuffle partition of a task into one file [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Vector functions overflow or underflow for finite Float64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Vector functions overflow or underflow for finite Float64 inputs [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] DRAFT Test aggmetrics3 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT Test aggmetrics3 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT Test aggmetrics3 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT Test aggmetrics3 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT Test aggmetrics3 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT Test aggmetrics3 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT Test aggmetrics3 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT Test aggmetrics3 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT Test aggmetrics3 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT Test aggmetrics3 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT Test aggmetrics3 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT Test aggmetrics3 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DRAFT Test aggmetrics3 [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages