github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] ci: add a Required Checks aggregator job so main can have a required status check [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add a Required Checks aggregator job so main can have a required status check [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add a Required Checks aggregator job so main can have a required status check [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add a Required Checks aggregator job so main can have a required status check [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add a Required Checks aggregator job so main can have a required status check [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] uses the opposite sign convention from PostgreSQL [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] `generate_series` over timestamps accepts only nanosecond precision, with a misleading error [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] `date_bin` with an explicit origin silently drifts an hour across a DST transition [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `date_bin` with an explicit origin silently drifts an hour across a DST transition [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] `date_bin` and `date_trunc` disagree on timezone-aware timestamps [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Using `date_bin` with a time zone in a time range that contains daylight savings does not work [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Cast from `Timestamp(_, None)` to a named timezone errors on DST boundaries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Cast from `Timestamp(_, None)` to a named timezone errors on DST boundaries [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: Sort-aware Iceberg reads in Comet via a per-partition streaming merge [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Sort-aware Iceberg reads in Comet via a per-partition streaming merge [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Sort-aware Iceberg reads in Comet via a per-partition streaming merge [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Sort-aware Iceberg reads in Comet via a per-partition streaming merge [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Sort-aware Iceberg reads in Comet via a per-partition streaming merge [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: share one Linux native build across CI workflows [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: share one Linux native build across CI workflows [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: share one Linux native build across CI workflows [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: share one Linux native build across CI workflows [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: share one Linux native build across CI workflows [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: share one Linux native build across CI workflows [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: share one Linux native build across CI workflows [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: share one Linux native build across CI workflows [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: share one Linux native build across CI workflows [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: support max_by and min_by aggregate expressions [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support max_by and min_by aggregate expressions [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support max_by and min_by aggregate expressions [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix(scheduler): repair test broken by a stale-base merge [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: render float and double Iceberg partition values like iceberg-java [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: render float and double Iceberg partition values like iceberg-java [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: render float and double Iceberg partition values like iceberg-java [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: render float and double Iceberg partition values like iceberg-java [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] minor: make MinIO tests more stable [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: stabilize grouped correlation with centered moments [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stabilize grouped correlation with centered moments [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stabilize grouped correlation with centered moments [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stabilize grouped correlation with centered moments [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Add a guard test that every CometNativeExec constructor parameter participates in equals [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: `AT TIME ZONE` on a timezone-aware timestamp returns a naive timestamp [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: `AT TIME ZONE` on a timezone-aware timestamp returns a naive timestamp [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: `AT TIME ZONE` on a timezone-aware timestamp returns a naive timestamp [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: `AT TIME ZONE` on a timezone-aware timestamp returns a naive timestamp [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: use session timezone for timestamp subtraction [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: use session timezone for timestamp subtraction [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce GitHub Actions usage (DataFusion is currently the top ASF consumer of GHA minutes) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] test: characterization and PostgreSQL differential coverage for timestamps with time zone [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test: PostgreSQL differential coverage for timestamps with time zone [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test: PostgreSQL differential coverage for timestamps with time zone [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] test: cover slice over expression-produced non-null element arrays (#… [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test: cover slice over expression-produced non-null element arrays (#… [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test: cover slice over expression-produced non-null element arrays (#… [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test: cover slice over expression-produced non-null element arrays (#… [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: support `timezone`, `timezone_hour` and `timezone_minute` in `date_part` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `timezone`, `timezone_hour` and `timezone_minute` in `date_part` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `timezone`, `timezone_hour` and `timezone_minute` in `date_part` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support `timezone`, `timezone_hour` and `timezone_minute` in `date_part` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Implement CI merge queue [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Implement CI merge queue [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Implement CI merge queue [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Implement CI merge queue [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: document timestamp and time zone semantics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document timestamp and time zone semantics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document timestamp and time zone semantics [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: [branch-1.0] evaluate posexplode array expressions once per batch (#5737) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: `from_unixtime` should respect `datafusion.execution.time_zone` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: `from_unixtime` should respect `datafusion.execution.time_zone` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: `from_unixtime` should respect `datafusion.execution.time_zone` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: `from_unixtime` should respect `datafusion.execution.time_zone` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: `from_unixtime` should respect `datafusion.execution.time_zone` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: `from_unixtime` should respect `datafusion.execution.time_zone` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: `from_unixtime` should respect `datafusion.execution.time_zone` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: `from_unixtime` should respect `datafusion.execution.time_zone` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: `from_unixtime` should respect `datafusion.execution.time_zone` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: `from_unixtime` should respect `datafusion.execution.time_zone` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: `from_unixtime` should respect `datafusion.execution.time_zone` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: `from_unixtime` should respect `datafusion.execution.time_zone` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: `from_unixtime` should respect `datafusion.execution.time_zone` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: `from_unixtime` should respect `datafusion.execution.time_zone` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Native Iceberg write renders float/double partition values differently from iceberg-java, and fails with "File name too long" for large values [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Native Iceberg write renders float/double partition values differently from iceberg-java, and fails with "File name too long" for large values [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Compaction with native Iceberg writes leaves a dangled position delete and adds two data files where iceberg-java adds one [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps-dev): bump baseline-browser-mapping from 2.9.19 to 2.11.21 in /datafusion/wasmtest/datafusion-wasm-app [datafusion-sandbox] via GitHub
• [PR] Postgres: allow reserved keywords as bare column alias [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Postgres: allow reserved keywords as bare column alias [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Postgres: allow reserved keywords as bare column alias [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: list a fanout Iceberg write's data files in a stable order [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: list a fanout Iceberg write's data files in a stable order [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Iceberg TestMetadataTablesWithPartitionEvolution.testPartitionColumnNamedPartition returns rows in a different order with native Iceberg writes enabled [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: evaluate struct-returning UDFs once across repeated field accesses [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: evaluate struct-returning UDFs once across repeated field accesses [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: evaluate struct-returning UDFs once across repeated field accesses [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: evaluate struct-returning UDFs once across repeated field accesses [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: evaluate struct-returning UDFs once across repeated field accesses [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] test: enable the Iceberg split-operator and native write by default to surface test failures [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add native Delta Lake scan contrib module (page/row-group pruning) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Allow a non-distinct count alongside the single distinct aggregate in SingleDistinctToGroupBy [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: push TopK dynamic filters into native Parquet scans [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: push TopK dynamic filters into native Parquet scans [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: push TopK dynamic filters into native Parquet scans [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: push TopK dynamic filters into native Parquet scans [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: push TopK dynamic filters into native Parquet scans [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: push TopK dynamic filters into native Parquet scans [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: push TopK dynamic filters into native Parquet scans [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: push TopK dynamic filters into native Parquet scans [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: push TopK dynamic filters into native Parquet scans [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: push TopK dynamic filters into native Parquet scans [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [EPIC] Split Aggregation Logic into Dedicated Streams [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: remove async-trait from dependency graph [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Physical-plan serialization drops ProjectionExec metadata [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: Optimize min(DISTINCT x) aggregations [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: support Spark encode expression via codegen dispatch [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Spark encode expression via codegen dispatch [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Reduce CI time (Comet is consuming 50% of DataFusion CI, which is a lot) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce CI time (Comet is consuming 50% of DataFusion CI, which is a lot) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce CI time (Comet is consuming 50% of DataFusion CI, which is a lot) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce CI time (Comet is consuming 50% of DataFusion CI, which is a lot) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce CI time (Comet is consuming 50% of DataFusion CI, which is a lot) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce CI time (Comet is consuming 50% of DataFusion CI, which is a lot) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce CI time (Comet is consuming 50% of DataFusion CI, which is a lot) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Reduce CI time (Comet is consuming 50% of DataFusion CI, which is a lot) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: preserve duplicate named_struct fields in codegen dispatch [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve duplicate named_struct fields in codegen dispatch [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve duplicate named_struct fields in codegen dispatch [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve duplicate named_struct fields in codegen dispatch [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: route wide-decimal hash and non-literal sha2 through the codege… [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: route wide-decimal hash and non-literal sha2 through the codege… [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: route wide-decimal hash and non-literal sha2 through the codege… [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Feature] Support Spark expression: encode [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: reject window functions in WHERE and HAVING during logical planning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: reject window functions in WHERE and HAVING during logical planning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: reject window functions in WHERE and HAVING during logical planning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: reject window functions in WHERE and HAVING during logical planning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: reject window functions in WHERE and HAVING during logical planning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: reject window functions in WHERE and HAVING during logical planning [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] testParquetTemporalTypes fuzz test does not include MapType [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] testParquetTemporalTypes fuzz test does not include MapType [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: validate parquet statistics config [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix(physical-plan): report Final emission for LeftSemi hash and neste… [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(physical-plan): report Final emission for LeftSemi hash and neste… [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: Set Substrait aggregation phase to INITIAL_TO_RESULT [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Set Substrait aggregation phase to INITIAL_TO_RESULT [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] test: add helpers to assert whether an expression ran natively or via codegen dispatch [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Test helpers to assert whether an expression ran natively or through the codegen dispatcher [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: vectorize the native map lookup behind element_at and GetMapValue [datafusion-comet] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages