github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Test: Add checks to sqllogictest temporary file creations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test: Add checks to sqllogictest temporary file creations [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Incorrect implementation of `PartialOrd` for `ScalarUDF`, `WindowUDF` and `AggregateUDF` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect implementation of `PartialOrd` for `ScalarUDF`, `WindowUDF` and `AggregateUDF` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] refactor `character_length` impl by unifying null handling logic [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor `character_length` impl by unifying null handling logic [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] add test for multi-column topk dynamic filter pushdown [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add test for multi-column topk dynamic filter pushdown [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: implement_comet_native_lpad_expr [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Enable `clippy::clone_on_ref_ptr` lint on workspace [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enable `clippy::clone_on_ref_ptr` lint on workspace [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Improve FFI testing and lifecycle tracking [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Potential bug with Arrow leak detection [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Potential bug with unaligned arrow arrays [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Potential bug with unaligned arrow arrays [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: rpad_bug_fix [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: Update to support try arithmetic functions [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Update to support try arithmetic functions [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Update to support try arithmetic functions [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Update to support try arithmetic functions [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Update to support try arithmetic functions [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Update to support try arithmetic functions [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Update to support try arithmetic functions [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Update to support try arithmetic functions [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Update to support try arithmetic functions [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Update to support try arithmetic functions [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Update to support try arithmetic functions [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only update TopK dynamic filters if the new ones are more selective [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add dynamic filter (bounds) pushdown to HashJoinExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add dynamic filter (bounds) pushdown to HashJoinExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add dynamic filter (bounds) pushdown to HashJoinExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add dynamic filter (bounds) pushdown to HashJoinExec [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: Improve logic for determining when an UnpackOrDeepCopy is needed [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve logic for determining when an UnpackOrDeepCopy is needed [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve logic for determining when an UnpackOrDeepCopy is needed [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve logic for determining when an UnpackOrDeepCopy is needed [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve logic for determining when an UnpackOrDeepCopy is needed [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve logic for determining when an UnpackOrDeepCopy is needed [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve logic for determining when an UnpackOrDeepCopy is needed [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve logic for determining when an UnpackOrDeepCopy is needed [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Improve logic for determining when an UnpackOrDeepCopy is needed [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Join fuzz [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix extended tests failure on main by updating `datafusion-testing` pin [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix extended tests failure on main by updating `datafusion-testing` pin [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix extended tests failure on main by updating `datafusion-testing` pin [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Extended tests are failing on main [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Extended tests are failing on main [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Include scan implementation name in CometScan nodeName [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: Add comprehensive Arrow FFI memory safety analysis [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Add Arrow FFI documentation [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] [branch-49] Update version to 49.0.1 and add changelog [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-49] Update version to 49.0.1 and add changelog [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-49] Update version to 49.0.1 and add changelog [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-49] Update version to 49.0.1 and add changelog [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-49] Update version to 49.0.1 and add changelog [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-49] Update version to 49.0.1 and add changelog [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-49] Update version to 49.0.1 and add changelog [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-49] Update version to 49.0.1 and add changelog [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.2` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.2` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.2` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.2` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.2` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.2` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.2` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.2` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.2` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.2` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `49.0.1` (patch) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] [branch-49] Pass the input schema to stats_projection for ProjectionExpr (#17123) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-49] Backport Pass the input schema to stats_projection for ProjectionExpr (#17123) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-49] Backport Pass the input schema to stats_projection for ProjectionExpr (#17123) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: implement QUALIFY clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement QUALIFY clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement QUALIFY clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement QUALIFY clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement QUALIFY clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement QUALIFY clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement QUALIFY clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement QUALIFY clause [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement QUALIFY clause [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: limit with offset support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: limit with offset support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Branch 49 17011 patch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Branch 49 17011 patch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Branch 49 17011 patch [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Support data source sampling with TABLESAMPLE [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support data source sampling with TABLESAMPLE [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support data source sampling with TABLESAMPLE [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Column::bounds_check goes into error path from ProjectionExpr::partition_statistics() [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Pass the input schema to stats_projection for ProjectionExpr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Pass the input schema to stats_projection for ProjectionExpr [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Pass the input schema to stats_projection for ProjectionExpr [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support old syntax for `approx_percentile_cont` and `approx_percentile_cont_with_weight` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] (Re)Support old syntax for `approx_percentile_cont` and `approx_percentile_cont_with_weight` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] (Re)Support old syntax for `approx_percentile_cont` and `approx_percentile_cont_with_weight` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fast parquet order inversion [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Push Dynamic Join Predicates into Scan ("Sideways Information Passing", etc) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Push Dynamic Join Predicates into Scan ("Sideways Information Passing", etc) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Push Dynamic Join Predicates into Scan ("Sideways Information Passing", etc) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Push Dynamic Join Predicates into Scan ("Sideways Information Passing", etc) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Push Dynamic Join Predicates into Scan ("Sideways Information Passing", etc) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Push Dynamic Join Predicates into Scan ("Sideways Information Passing", etc) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Push down entire hash table from HashJoinExec into scans [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Push down entire hash table from HashJoinExec into scans [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Minor: display filter in HashJoin's tree explain [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Minor: display filter in HashJoin's tree explain [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Disproportionate memory use for `DISTINCT ON` query [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Deprecate unused `ScalarUDF::display_name` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate unused `ScalarUDF::display_name` [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages