github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ExecutionPlan: add APIs for filter pushdown & optimizer rule to apply them [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump mimalloc from 0.1.43 to 0.1.45 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump mimalloc from 0.1.43 to 0.1.45 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump mimalloc from 0.1.43 to 0.1.45 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump mimalloc from 0.1.43 to 0.1.44 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump mimalloc from 0.1.43 to 0.1.44 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump pyo3-build-config from 0.23.4 to 0.24.1 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump pyo3-build-config from 0.23.4 to 0.24.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump pyo3-build-config from 0.23.4 to 0.24.0 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump tokio from 1.43.0 to 1.44.2 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump arrow from 54.3.0 to 54.3.1 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump tokio from 1.43.0 to 1.44.1 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump tokio from 1.43.0 to 1.44.1 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [I] `EXPLAIN` only outputs an empty plan where there's a `plan_err` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `EXPLAIN` only outputs an empty plan where there's a `plan_err` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Set DataFusion runtime configurations through SQL interface [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Set DataFusion runtime configurations through SQL interface [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Format `Date32` to string given timestamp specifiers [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Format `Date32` to string given timestamp specifiers [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Format `Date32` to string given timestamp specifiers [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Format `Date32` to string given timestamp specifiers [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Format `Date32` to string given timestamp specifiers [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Format `Date32` to string given timestamp specifiers [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Format `Date32` to string given timestamp specifiers [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Format `Date32` to string given timestamp specifiers [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Format `Date32` to string given timestamp specifiers [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Format `Date32` to string given timestamp specifiers [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Dependency conflict with rquest due to async-compression and xz2 linking to lzma [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] refactor(joins::utils): Replace OnceAsync/OnceFut with tokio's OnceCell [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Improve spill performance: Disable re-validation of spilled files [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Support additional DuckDB integer types such as HUGEINT, UHUGEINT, etc [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [PR] Use pager and allow configuration via `\pset` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use pager and allow configuration via `\pset` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use pager and allow configuration via `\pset` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use pager and allow configuration via `\pset` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use pager and allow configuration via `\pset` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use pager and allow configuration via `\pset` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use pager and allow configuration via `\pset` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Blog post on Parquet filter pushdown [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Blog post on Parquet filter pushdown [datafusion-site] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Push Dynamic Join Predicates into Scan ("Sideways Information Passing", etc) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] MSSQL: Add support for functionality `MERGE` output clause [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MSSQL: Add support for functionality `MERGE` output clause [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support zero copy hash repartitioning for Hash Aggregate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support zero copy hash repartitioning for Hash Aggregate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support zero copy hash repartitioning for Hash Aggregate [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: change OSX/OS X to macOS [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Use a pager for query results in datafusion-cli [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use a pager for query results in datafusion-cli [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Rust] [datafusion] Allow integration in non libc environments [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Analysis to support`SortPreservingMerge` --> `ProgressiveEval` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] experiment: Selectively remove CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] experiment: Selectively remove CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] experiment: Selectively remove CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] experiment: Selectively remove CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] experiment: Selectively remove CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] experiment: Selectively remove CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] experiment: Selectively remove CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] experiment: Selectively remove CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] experiment: Selectively remove CoalesceBatchesExec [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Support for projection item prefix operator (CONNECT_BY_ROOT) [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for projection item prefix operator (CONNECT_BY_ROOT) [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add support for MSSQL IF/ELSE statements. [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for MSSQL IF/ELSE statements. [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for MSSQL IF/ELSE statements. [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for MSSQL IF/ELSE statements. [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for MSSQL IF/ELSE statements. [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for MSSQL IF/ELSE statements. [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for MSSQL IF/ELSE statements. [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for MSSQL IF/ELSE statements. [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [I] [complex types] count distinct fails with native scan [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [complex types] count distinct fails with native scan [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BLOG] tpchgen-rs: World’s fastest open source TPCH data generator, written in Rust [datafusion-site] via GitHub
• Re: [I] bench: Extract tokio Runtime creation from benchmarking functions [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add documentation about how to plan custom expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add documentation for `Run extended tests` command [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix!: incorrect coercion when comparing with string literals [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix!: incorrect coercion when comparing with string literals [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix!: incorrect coercion when comparing with string literals [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix!: incorrect coercion when comparing with string literals [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix!: incorrect coercion when comparing with string literals [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix!: incorrect coercion when comparing with string literals [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix!: incorrect coercion when comparing with string literals [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Integrate `Analyzer` within LogicalPlan building stage [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] #5483 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Migrate datafusion/sql tests to insta, part5 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Migrate datafusion/sql tests to insta, part5 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] bench: Extract tokio Runtime creation from bench functions [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Perf: Support Utf8View datatype single column comparisons for SortPre… [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] ArraySort: support structs [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix duplicate unqualified Field name (schema error) on join queries [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] add extend sql for issue-11212 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore(deps): Update sqlparser to 0.55.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Update ClickBench queries to avoid `to_timestamp_seconds` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] minor: Decouple `ExecutionGraph` and `DistributedPlanner` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] minor: Decouple `ExecutionGraph` and `DistributedPlanner` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Native scan panic with native_iceberg_compat on hdfs [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: Unconditionally wrap UNION BY NAME input nodes w/ `Projection` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add documentation example for `AggregateExprBuilder` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] simplify `array_has` UDF to `InList` expr when haystack is constant [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Enhance Schema adapter to accommodate evolving struct [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] upgraded spark 3.5.4 to 3.5.5 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Organize fields inside `SortMergeJoinStream` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: Introduce sort prefix computation for early TopK exit optimization on partially sorted input [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] `Statistics::total_byte_size` does not account for projection in `FileScanConfig::with_projection` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: support merge for `Distribution` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Use `any` instead of `for_each` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add bloom filter into integration test for parquet predicate pushdown [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Native shuffle inaccurate estimate of builder memory allocation [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Consider Vendoring Certain Dependencies [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support for user defined FFI functions [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [I] `physical-expr`: Nullability of `Literal` is not determined by surrounding context [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Include Apple macOS support in jars in Maven central [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Apache DataFusion Google Summer of Code (GSoC) 2025 Application Guidelines [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Update ClickBench queries to avoid to_timestamp_seconds [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] ArraySort: Support structs [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore: Fix some inconsistencies in memory pool configuration [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Extend snowflake grant options support [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] docs: Update supported Spark versions [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Revert "Optimize CASE expression for "expr or expr" usage. (#13953)" [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Word Count [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Move `DataSink` to `datasource` and add session crate [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add test cases for NULL in joins as key values [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Support multiple results comparison in benchmark scripts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support multiple results comparison in benchmark scripts [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Remove record_batch! macro once upstream updates [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add short circuit evaluation for `AND` and `OR` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add short circuit evaluation for `AND` and `OR` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add short circuit evaluation for `AND` and `OR` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add short circuit evaluation for `AND` and `OR` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add short circuit evaluation for `AND` and `OR` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add short circuit evaluation for `AND` and `OR` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add short circuit evaluation for `AND` and `OR` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add short circuit evaluation for `AND` and `OR` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add short circuit evaluation for `AND` and `OR` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add short circuit evaluation for `AND` and `OR` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add short circuit evaluation for `AND` and `OR` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add short circuit evaluation for `AND` and `OR` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add short circuit evaluation for `AND` and `OR` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add short circuit evaluation for `AND` and `OR` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add short circuit evaluation for `AND` and `OR` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add short circuit evaluation for `AND` and `OR` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add short circuit evaluation for `AND` and `OR` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add short circuit evaluation for `AND` and `OR` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add short circuit evaluation for `AND` and `OR` [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages