jonathanc-n commented on code in PR #16716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16716#discussion_r2194796765
##########
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/utils.rs:
##########
@@ -928,6 +929,55 @@ pub(crate) fn build_batch_from_indices(
Ok(RecordBatch::try_new(Arc::new(schema.clone()), columns)?)
}
+/// Returns a new [RecordBatch] resulting of a join where the build/left side
is empty.
+/// The resulting batch has [Schema] `schema`.
+pub(crate) fn build_batch_empty_build_side(
+ schema: &Schema,
+ build_batch: &RecordBatch,
+ probe_batch: &RecordBatch,
+ column_indices: &[ColumnIndex],
+ join_type: JoinType,
+) -> Result<RecordBatch> {
+ match join_type {
+ // these join types only return data if the left side is not empty, so
we return an
+ // empty RecordBatch
+ JoinType::Inner
Review Comment:
Yes this makes sense, cross join is not a join type that would go through
creating hash table
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
