jonathanc-n opened a new issue, #16773: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16773
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? > I think batch coalescer won't make this faster as this is buffering everything in memory anyway. > > The main idea would be to apply the filters iteratively to the incoming `RecordBatch` instead of the indices, so we have to change the API / implementation a bit more. @Dandandan mentions in #16443 that we apply filters to the `RecordBatch` when processing incoming batches in nested loop join. ### Describe the solution you'd like _No response_ ### Describe alternatives you've considered _No response_ ### Additional context _No response_ -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
