github  

Messages by Thread

• [I] arrow-ipc-optimizations in ballista-executor does not forward to ballista-core [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] Check for overflows in left dataset concat in hash join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Check for overflows in left dataset concat in hash join [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Make fair_unified account for spillable consumers [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add DataFusion 55.0.0 release blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: track peak memory before JVM shuffle spill [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: track peak memory before JVM shuffle spill [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: track peak memory before JVM shuffle spill [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Add ordered bind placeholder dialect metadata [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(proto): preserve AnalyzeExec metric types across serialization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(proto): preserve AnalyzeExec metric types across serialization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(proto): preserve AnalyzeExec metric types across serialization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(proto): preserve AnalyzeExec metric types across serialization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(proto): preserve AnalyzeExec metric types across serialization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(proto): preserve AnalyzeExec metric types across serialization [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Snowflake: Add support for ->> (pipe) operator for chaining SQL stmts [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Snowflake: Add support for ->> (pipe) operator for chaining SQL stmts [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [I] Blog post about Range Partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Blog post about Range Partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Blog post about Range Partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Blog post about Range Partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Blog post about Range Partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: stop treating arithmetic negation as bitwise NOT [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop treating arithmetic negation as bitwise NOT [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop treating arithmetic negation as bitwise NOT [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop treating arithmetic negation as bitwise NOT [datafusion] via GitHub
  • [PR] fix: stop treating arithmetic negation as bitwise NOT [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop treating arithmetic negation as bitwise NOT [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop treating arithmetic negation as bitwise NOT [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop treating arithmetic negation as bitwise NOT [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop treating arithmetic negation as bitwise NOT [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop treating arithmetic negation as bitwise NOT [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop treating arithmetic negation as bitwise NOT [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop treating arithmetic negation as bitwise NOT [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop treating arithmetic negation as bitwise NOT [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop treating arithmetic negation as bitwise NOT [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop treating arithmetic negation as bitwise NOT [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop treating arithmetic negation as bitwise NOT [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop treating arithmetic negation as bitwise NOT [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: stop treating arithmetic negation as bitwise NOT [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] Extending Partitioning to Support More Variants [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] Extending Partitioning to Support More Variants [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] Extending Partitioning to Support More Variants [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSSION] Extending Partitioning to Support More Variants [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: release native shuffle reservation after spill failure [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: release native shuffle reservation after spill failure [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: release native shuffle reservation after spill failure [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: release native shuffle reservation after spill failure [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: release native shuffle reservation after spill failure [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] Expression simplifier treats arithmetic negation as bitwise NOT [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Expression simplifier treats arithmetic negation as bitwise NOT [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: handle multibyte characters in physical plan tree renderer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: handle multibyte characters in physical plan tree renderer [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: handle multibyte characters in physical plan tree renderer [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add recursion checks for parse_data_type [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [I] Tree-format physical plan renderer can panic on multibyte UTF-8 text [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: Handle dictionary inputs once [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Correctness guard: disable memory-limited NestedLoopJoin fallback for LEFT-family joins with multi-partition right side [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Correctness guard: disable memory-limited NestedLoopJoin fallback for LEFT-family joins with multi-partition right side [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] NestedLoopJoinExec spill fallback evaluates the left input twice [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support streaming aggregates when partitions are unsorted but non‑overlapping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support streaming aggregates when partitions are unsorted but non‑overlapping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support streaming aggregates when partitions are unsorted but non‑overlapping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support streaming aggregates when partitions are unsorted but non‑overlapping [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] tests: Add `IN` list coverage for FixedSizeBinary [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] tests: Add `IN` list coverage for FixedSizeBinary [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] tests: Add `IN` list coverage for FixedSizeBinary [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] tests: Add `IN` list coverage for FixedSizeBinary [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] TopKRow ordering is inconsistent, preventing a possible sort optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopKRow ordering is inconsistent, preventing a possible sort optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Memory accounting inaccuracies in multi level merge [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] IN LIST: handle dictionary-encoded needles once via a DictionaryFilter wrapper [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IN LIST: handle dictionary-encoded needles once (rather than in each filter type) to reduce code size [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] InList: add more integration test for Inlist [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] InList: add more integration test for Inlist [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Inline Word::to_ident [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [PR] Redshift: allow INTERVAL as a column name [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Redshift: allow INTERVAL as a column name [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(core): reject a DELETE or an UPDATE whose WHERE clause cannot reach the provider [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(core): reject a DELETE or an UPDATE whose WHERE clause cannot reach the provider [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(core): reject a DELETE or an UPDATE whose WHERE clause cannot reach the provider [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] EXPLAIN DELETE and EXPLAIN UPDATE execute the statement on an in-memory table [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] EXPLAIN DELETE and EXPLAIN UPDATE execute the statement on an in-memory table [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(catalog): apply a MemTable DELETE or UPDATE when the plan runs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(catalog): apply a MemTable DELETE or UPDATE when the plan runs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(catalog): apply a MemTable DELETE or UPDATE when the plan runs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(catalog): apply a MemTable DELETE or UPDATE when the plan runs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(catalog): apply a MemTable DELETE or UPDATE when the plan runs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(catalog): apply a MemTable DELETE or UPDATE when the plan runs [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] A DELETE or an UPDATE with an IN or an EXISTS subquery in its WHERE clause changes every row [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] A DELETE or an UPDATE with an IN or an EXISTS subquery in its WHERE clause changes every row [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.86.1 to 2.86.5 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump taiki-e/install-action from 2.86.1 to 2.86.5 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump the codeql-actions group across 1 directory with 2 updates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump the codeql-actions group across 1 directory with 2 updates [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump the all-other-cargo-deps group with 2 updates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump the all-other-cargo-deps group with 2 updates [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump pygithub from 2.9.1 to 2.10.0 in the all-uv-deps group [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump pygithub from 2.9.1 to 2.10.0 in the all-uv-deps group [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump cargo from 0.98.0 to 0.99.0 in /dev/depcheck [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump cargo from 0.98.0 to 0.99.0 in /dev/depcheck [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: ignore exact empty files in ordering analysis [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: ignore exact empty files in ordering analysis [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: ignore exact empty files in ordering analysis [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: ignore exact empty files in ordering analysis [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: ignore exact empty files in ordering analysis [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: ignore exact empty files in ordering analysis [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Empty Parquet files invalidate file ordering and statistics-based grouping [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat(core): ValueIndexExec + ValueIndexReader + shuffle FileWriter switch [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(core): ValueIndexExec + ValueIndexReader + shuffle FileWriter switch [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] Add support for dictionary for approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for dictionary for approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for dictionary for approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for dictionary for approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for dictionary for approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for dictionary for approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for dictionary for approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for dictionary for approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for dictionary for approx_distinct [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] TPCH benchmark fails with `Failed to open partition file at "/var/folders/..../data.arrow"` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TPCH benchmark fails with `Failed to open partition file at "/var/folders/..../data.arrow"` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TPCH benchmark fails with `Failed to open partition file at "/var/folders/..../data.arrow"` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TPCH benchmark fails with `Failed to open partition file at "/var/folders/..../data.arrow"` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: make StatisticsRegistry the default operator-statistics path [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: make StatisticsRegistry the default operator-statistics path [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: make StatisticsRegistry the default operator-statistics path [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: make StatisticsRegistry the default operator-statistics path [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Follow-up #22450] Per-RG `fully_matched` RowFilter skip · needs arrow-rs#10158 (`peek_next_row_group`) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] test: check sql_example tables line up [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test: check sql_example tables line up [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] test: check sql_example tables line up [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add `EmitTo::FirstBlock` for grouped aggregate emission [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add `EmitTo::FirstBlock` for grouped aggregate emission [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump ordered-float from 5.3.0 to 5.5.0 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump ordered-float from 5.3.0 to 5.5.0 [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Doris SQL: create table column options [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [I] Support date_bin / date_trunc satisfaction for multi-key Range partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support date_bin / date_trunc satisfaction for multi-key Range partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support date_bin / date_trunc satisfaction for multi-key Range partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support date_bin / date_trunc satisfaction for multi-key Range partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support date_bin / date_trunc satisfaction for multi-key Range partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Remove timezone.rs copy of arrow-array Tz (now public in arrow 58) [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] refactor: use Arrow timezone type [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] refactor: use Arrow timezone type [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] perf(core): skip IPC validation on the sort-shuffle read paths [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): skip IPC validation on the sort-shuffle read paths [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] deps: [DO NOT MERGE] bump DataFusion 55.0 and Arrow/Parqet 59.1 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps: [DO NOT MERGE] bump DataFusion 55.0 and Arrow/Parqet 59.1 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Parallel bounded RANGE-frame window functions without PARTITION BY (draft) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Parallel bounded RANGE-frame window functions without PARTITION BY (draft) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(spark): support the scale argument in Spark ceil [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: validate parquet statistics config [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: validate parquet statistics config [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: validate parquet statistics config [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: validate parquet statistics config [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: add md formatting to `make format` [datafusion-comet] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages