Dandandan commented on PR #18873:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/18873#issuecomment-3565825712

   
   
   > I am also testing with just `filter_pushdown` on:
   > 
   > * [TEST: enable pushdown_filters by default 
#18874](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/18874)
   > 
   > I am going to focus my efforts on profiling these queries which seem to 
have gotten the most slower:
   > 
   > ```
   > │ QQuery 24    │   215.96 ms │                   253.74 ms │   1.17x 
slower │
   > │ QQuery 25    │   489.11 ms │                   617.52 ms │   1.26x 
slower │
   > │ QQuery 26    │   228.11 ms │                   324.39 ms │   1.42x 
slower │
   > ```
   > 
   > Here is the query:
   > 
   > ```shell
   > set datafusion.execution.parquet.binary_as_string = true
   > SELECT "SearchPhrase" FROM hits WHERE "SearchPhrase" <> '' ORDER BY 
"SearchPhrase" LIMIT 10;
   > ```
   > 
   > Basically my next steps are to profile these queries and see what is 
slower (and if it is related to filter representation, I will go focus on 
[apache/arrow-rs#8902](https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/8902))
   
   Looks like we are very close!
   
   FYI, there a couple more slow than query 24:
   ```
   │ QQuery 26    │   228.11 ms │                   324.39 ms │   1.42x slower │
   │ QQuery 10    │   363.24 ms │                   484.80 ms │   1.33x slower │
   │ QQuery 7     │    54.19 ms │                    68.48 ms │   1.26x slower │
   │ QQuery 25    │   489.11 ms │                   617.52 ms │   1.26x slower │
   │ QQuery 11    │   427.02 ms │                   532.87 ms │   1.25x slower │
   ```


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to