github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] perf: Optimize `approx_distinct` for inline Utf8View [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Optimize `approx_distinct` for inline Utf8View [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Optimize `approx_distinct` for inline Utf8View [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Optimize `approx_distinct` for inline Utf8View [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Optimize `approx_distinct` for inline Utf8View [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Optimize `approx_distinct` for inline Utf8View [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Optimize `approx_distinct` for inline Utf8View [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Optimize `approx_distinct` for inline Utf8View [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Optimize `approx_distinct` for inline Utf8View [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Optimize `approx_distinct` for inline Utf8View [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Filter pushdown past children with fetch limits causes correctness bug [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Filter pushdown past children with fetch limits causes correctness bug [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Filter pushdown past children with fetch limits causes correctness bug [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Filter pushdown past children with fetch limits causes correctness bug [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: optimize scatter with type-specific specialization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize scatter with type-specific specialization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize scatter with type-specific specialization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize scatter with type-specific specialization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize scatter with type-specific specialization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize scatter with type-specific specialization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize scatter with type-specific specialization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize scatter with type-specific specialization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize scatter with type-specific specialization [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(spark): Adds spark round function [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(spark): Adds spark round function [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(spark): Adds spark round function [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: Remove duplicate imports in test code [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Remove duplicate imports in test code [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Remove duplicate imports in test code [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Remove duplicate imports in test code [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Remove duplicate imports in test code [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Remove duplicate imports in test code [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : ABI upgrade from abi_stabby to stabby since abi_stable is no longer maintained [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add a working, more complete example of using a catalog (docs) [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a working, more complete example of using a catalog (docs) [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [I] lpad, rpad, translate should use codepoints, not graphemes [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] lpad, rpad, translate should use codepoints, not graphemes [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] lpad, rpad, translate should use codepoints, not graphemes [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: array to array cast [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: array to array cast [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: array to array cast [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: array to array cast [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: array to array cast [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: array to array cast [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: array to array cast [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: array to array cast [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: array to array cast [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: array to array cast [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: array to array cast [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Shuffle format [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Replace Arrow IPC with more efficient shuffle format [WIP] [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: preserve duplicate GROUPING SETS rows [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve duplicate GROUPING SETS rows [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve duplicate GROUPING SETS rows [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve duplicate GROUPING SETS rows [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve duplicate GROUPING SETS rows [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve duplicate GROUPING SETS rows [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve duplicate GROUPING SETS rows [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve duplicate GROUPING SETS rows [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [EPIC] Sort pushdown / partially sorted scans [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Sort pushdown / partially sorted scans [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Sort pushdown / partially sorted scans [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Sort pushdown / partially sorted scans [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Don't push down filter if sort has fetch, same as limit [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't push down filter if sort has fetch, same as limit [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't push down filter if sort has fetch, same as limit [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't push down filter if sort has fetch, same as limit [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't push down filter if sort has fetch, same as limit [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't push down filter if sort has fetch, same as limit [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't push down filter if sort has fetch, same as limit [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't push down filter if sort has fetch, same as limit [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't push down filter if sort has fetch, same as limit [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix push_down_filter for children with non-empty fetch fields [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] add `PhysicalProtoConverterExtension` to `PhysicalExtensionCodec` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] add `PhysicalProtoConverterExtension` to `PhysicalExtensionCodec` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] add proto converter reference to PhysicalExtensionCodec [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: Tuple IN null semantics for struct comparisons [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Tuple IN null semantics for struct comparisons [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Tuple IN null semantics for struct comparisons [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Tuple IN null semantics for struct comparisons [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Tuple IN null semantics for struct comparisons [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Tuple IN null semantics for struct comparisons [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Tuple IN null semantics for struct comparisons [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Tuple IN null semantics for struct comparisons [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: Tuple IN null semantics for struct comparisons [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Avoid redundant memory access in ArrowBytesViewMap for inline values [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: improve json read [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: improve json read [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: improve json read [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: improve json read [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: improve json read [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: improve json read [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: improve json read [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: improve json read [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: improve json read [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Support Spark expression window time [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Spark expression window_time [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Spark expression window_time [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Spark expression window_time [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Spark expression window_time [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Spark expression window_time [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Spark expression window_time [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Spark expression window_time [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Spark expression window_time [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Spark expression window_time [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Spark expression window_time [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Spark expression window_time [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Spark expression window_time [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Spark expression window_time [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Spark expression window_time [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Support Spark expression window_time [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] [main] Update version to 52.4.0 and update changelog [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [main] Update version to 52.4.0 and update changelog [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [main] Update version to 52.4.0 and update changelog [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [branch-53] fix: InList Dictionary filter pushdown type mismatch (#20962) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [branch-53] fix: InList Dictionary filter pushdown type mismatch (#20962) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [branch-52] fix: maintain inner list nullability for `array_sort` (#19948) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Native engine crashes on literal DateTrunc and TimestampTrunc [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix `elapsed_compute` metric for Parquet DataSourceExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix `elapsed_compute` metric for Parquet DataSourceExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix `elapsed_compute` metric for Parquet DataSourceExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix `elapsed_compute` metric for Parquet DataSourceExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix `elapsed_compute` metric for Parquet DataSourceExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix `elapsed_compute` metric for Parquet DataSourceExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix `elapsed_compute` metric for Parquet DataSourceExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix `elapsed_compute` metric for Parquet DataSourceExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix `elapsed_compute` metric for Parquet DataSourceExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix `elapsed_compute` metric for Parquet DataSourceExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix `elapsed_compute` metric for Parquet DataSourceExec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix `elapsed_compute` metric for Parquet DataSourceExec [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: apply the left side schema on the right side in set expressions [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Add bounded distinct count optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add bounded distinct count optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add bounded distinct count optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add bounded distinct count optimization [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [D] How DataFusion could support other compute engines (libcudf, velox) [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages