github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join with anti join [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Comet 0.9.0 [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Comet 0.9.0 [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Comet 0.9.0 [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Comet 0.9.0 [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Comet 0.9.0 [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Comet 0.9.0 [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Comet 0.9.0 [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Comet 0.9.0 [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Comet 0.9.0 [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Comet 0.9.0 [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Comet 0.9.0 [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Comet 0.9.0 [datafusion-site] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: [branch-0.9] Prepare 0.9.0 rc2 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: [branch-0.9] Prepare 0.9.0 rc2 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: [branch-0.9] Prepare 0.9.0 rc2 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopK Sort incorrectly pushed down past Join [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: [branch-0.9] Backport Spark 4.0.0 support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: [branch-0.9] Backport Spark 4.0.0 support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: [branch-0.9] Backport Spark 4.0.0 support [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Update 4.0.0.diff to reflect recent improvements in 3.5.5.diff [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Add support for MySQL MEMBER OF [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for MySQL MEMBER OF [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for MySQL MEMBER OF [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for MySQL MEMBER OF [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Change tag and policy names to `ObjectName` instead of `Ident` [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change tag and policy names to `ObjectName` instead of `Ident` [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: reserved keywords in qualified column names [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Push Dynamic Join Predicates into Scan ("Sideways Information Passing", etc) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Push Dynamic Join Predicates into Scan ("Sideways Information Passing", etc) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump substrait from 0.57.0 to 0.58.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump substrait from 0.57.0 to 0.58.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix discrepancy in Float64 to timestamp(9) casts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix discrepancy in Float64 to timestamp(9) casts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix discrepancy in Float64 to timestamp(9) casts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix discrepancy in Float64 to timestamp(9) casts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix discrepancy in Float64 to timestamp(9) casts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix discrepancy in Float64 to timestamp(9) casts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix discrepancy in Float64 to timestamp(9) casts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix discrepancy in Float64 to timestamp(9) casts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix discrepancy in Float64 to timestamp(9) casts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix discrepancy in Float64 to timestamp(9) casts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix discrepancy in Float64 to timestamp(9) casts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix discrepancy in Float64 to timestamp(9) casts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix discrepancy in Float64 to timestamp(9) casts [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix discrepancy in Float64 to timestamp(9) casts for constants [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix discrepancy in Float64 to timestamp(9) casts for constants [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix discrepancy in Float64 to timestamp(9) casts for constants [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix discrepancy in Float64 to timestamp(9) casts for constants [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Update all spark SLT files [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update all spark SLT files [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Different result of double to timestamp(9) cast when source value is constant [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Different result of double to timestamp(9) cast when source value is constant [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Different result of double to timestamp(9) cast when source value is constant [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] doc: Add comment about local clippy run before submitting a pull request [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] doc: Add comment about local clippy run before submitting a pull request [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add `SessionConfig` reference to `ScalarFunctionArgs` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add `SessionConfig` reference to `ScalarFunctionArgs` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add `SessionConfig` reference to `ScalarFunctionArgs` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Expose execution time zone to UDFs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expose execution time zone to UDFs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expose execution time zone to UDFs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expose execution time zone to UDFs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expose execution time zone to UDFs [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Consider merging / replacing `try_cast_literal_to_type` with `ScalarValue::cast_to` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Support data source sampling with TABLESAMPLE [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add multi level merge sort that will always fit in memory [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add an example of embedding indexes inside a parquet file [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add an example of embedding indexes inside a parquet file [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add an example of embedding indexes inside a parquet file [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add an example of embedding indexes inside a parquet file [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add an example of embedding indexes inside a parquet file [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add an example of embedding indexes inside a parquet file [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add an example of embedding indexes inside a parquet file [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add an example of embedding indexes inside a parquet file [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add an example of embedding indexes inside a parquet file [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add an example of embedding indexes inside a parquet file [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add an example of embedding indexes inside a parquet file [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add an example of embedding indexes inside a parquet file [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix release dockerfile [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: Fix release dockerfile [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: Fix release dockerfile [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] `datafusion-cli`: Refactor statement execution logic [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] `datafusion-cli`: Refactor statement execution logic [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] `datafusion-cli`: Refactor statement execution logic [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] `datafusion-cli`: Refactor statement execution logic [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add PhysicalExpr optimizer and cast unwrapping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add PhysicalExpr optimizer and cast unwrapping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add PhysicalExpr optimizer and cast unwrapping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add PhysicalExpr optimizer and cast unwrapping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add PhysicalExpr optimizer and cast unwrapping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add PhysicalExpr optimizer and cast unwrapping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add PhysicalExpr optimizer and cast unwrapping [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: implement predicate adaptation for nested structs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement predicate adaptation for nested structs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement predicate adaptation for nested structs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement predicate adaptation for nested structs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement predicate adaptation for nested structs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement predicate adaptation for nested structs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement predicate adaptation for nested structs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement predicate adaptation for nested structs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement predicate adaptation for nested structs [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement predicate adaptation for nested structs [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: sqllogictest runner label condition mismatch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: sqllogictest runner label condition mismatch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: sqllogictest runner label condition mismatch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: sqllogictest runner label condition mismatch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: sqllogictest runner label condition mismatch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: sqllogictest runner label condition mismatch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: sqllogictest runner label condition mismatch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: sqllogictest runner label condition mismatch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: sqllogictest runner label condition mismatch [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [substrait] [sqllogictest] table 'datafusion.public.aggregate_test_100_by_sql' not found [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [substrait] [sqllogictest] table 'datafusion.public.aggregate_test_100_by_sql' not found [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: DuckDB accepts 2nd characters argument to TRIM [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: DuckDB accepts 2nd characters argument to TRIM [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: DuckDB accepts 2nd characters argument to TRIM [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DuckDB: Add support for multiple `TRIM` arguments [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Adds script to detect breaking API changes/ semver [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adds script to detect breaking API changes/ semver [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: Update benchmark results for 0.9.0 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Update benchmark results for 0.9.0 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Update benchmark results for 0.9.0 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Update benchmark results for 0.9.0 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages