github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [I] Support `push_batch_with_filter` in LimitedBatchCoalescer / `FilterExec` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PushdownFilter optimizations [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Refactor InListExpr into static-filter modules [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: optimize retract_batch for `median` and `percentile_cont` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize retract_batch for `median` and `percentile_cont` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: optimize retract_batch for `median` and `percentile_cont` [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] docs(optimizer): add generated optimizer rules reference [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Document DataFusion optimizer rules [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Enable test `cast nested ArrayType to nested ArrayType` [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Enable test `cast nested ArrayType to nested ArrayType` [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Deduplicate InList primitive static filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deduplicate InList primitive static filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deduplicate InList primitive static filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deduplicate InList primitive static filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deduplicate InList primitive static filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deduplicate InList primitive static filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deduplicate InList primitive static filters [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: simplify HashJoinExec dynamic filter, drop CASE routing [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix nesting of permissions block in docs workflow [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix nesting of permissions block in docs workflow [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] WIP: test Spark `array_exists` with lambdas [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Feature] Support Spark expression: string_to_map [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Split proto serialization to encapsulate private state (#21835) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Split proto serialization to encapsulate private state (#21835) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Test Comet with DataFusion lambda functions [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test Comet with DataFusion lambda functions [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] WIP: wire `array_exists` on experimental DF branch [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: wire `array_exists` on experimental DF branch [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] ScalarValue::compacted() does not free unused view-buffer memory for Utf8View / BinaryView arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] ScalarValue::compacted() does not free unused view-buffer memory for Utf8View / BinaryView arrays [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] bug: datafusion-spark substring returns wrong result for large negative start positions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] bug: datafusion-spark substring returns wrong result for large negative start positions [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] bug: datafusion-spark substring returns wrong result for large negative start positions [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: substring with negative start index [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: substring with negative start index [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: substring with negative start index [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize generic InList static filtering [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize generic InList static filtering [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize generic InList static filtering [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize generic InList static filtering [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: Fix errors in list of supported Spark versions [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: Fix errors in list of supported Spark versions [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: support Decimal128 variance/stddev [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: support Decimal128 variance/stddev [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(executor): bound executor memory via --memory-pool-size [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(executor): bound executor memory via --memory-pool-size [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(executor): bound executor memory via --memory-pool-size [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(executor): bound executor memory via --memory-pool-size [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(executor): bound executor memory via --memory-pool-size [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(executor): bound executor memory via --memory-pool-size [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: rewrite concat(array, ...) to array_concat [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Branch 53 cherry pick 10 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] ci: add Spark 4.0 / JDK 21 profile [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add Spark 4.0 / JDK 21 profile [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: move shuffle writer disk I/O off tokio worker threads [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: move shuffle writer disk I/O off tokio worker threads [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: move shuffle writer disk I/O off tokio worker threads [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: move shuffle writer disk I/O off tokio worker threads [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: move shuffle writer disk I/O off tokio worker threads [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: move shuffle writer disk I/O off tokio worker threads [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: move shuffle writer disk I/O off tokio worker threads [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] feat[expr-common]: support regex and LIKE coercion on REE<Dict> types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat[expr-common]: support regex and LIKE coercion on REE<Dict> types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat[expr-common]: support regex and LIKE coercion on REE<Dict> types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat[expr-common]: support regex and LIKE coercion on REE<Dict> types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat[expr-common]: support regex and LIKE coercion on REE<Dict> types [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat[expr-common]: support regex and LIKE coercion on REE and Dict value types that require an extra coercion step [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat[expr-common]: support regex and LIKE coercion on REE and Dict value types that require an extra coercion step [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat[expr-common]: support regex and LIKE coercion on REE and Dict value types that require an extra coercion step [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat[expr-common]: support regex and LIKE coercion on REE and Dict value types that require an extra coercion step [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] How to limit the maximum memory usage of the ballista executor? [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] How to limit the maximum memory usage of the ballista executor? [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [I] Regex (~) and LIKE on RunEndEncoded<Dictionary(...)> columns fail to plan [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Regex (~) and LIKE on RunEndEncoded<Dictionary(...)> columns fail to plan [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(sort-shuffle): enable sort-based shuffle by default [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(sort-shuffle): enable sort-based shuffle by default [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(sort-shuffle): enable sort-based shuffle by default [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(sort-shuffle): enable sort-based shuffle by default [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(sort-shuffle): enable sort-based shuffle by default [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(sort-shuffle): enable sort-based shuffle by default [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(sort-shuffle): enable sort-based shuffle by default [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(sort-shuffle): enable sort-based shuffle by default [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] WIP: Refactor NLJ with `JoinAccelerator` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: Refactor NLJ with `JoinAccelerator` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] WIP: Refactor NLJ with `JoinAccelerator` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Proposal: Refactor NLJ into an extensible framework for specialized joins [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Comet native sort lacks row-format support for Struct(Map(...)) sort keys [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Comet native sort lacks row-format support for Struct(Map(...)) sort keys [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [D] DISCUSSION: Seattle DataFusion Meetup (April 23, 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: Seattle DataFusion Meetup (April 23, 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] DISCUSSION: Seattle DataFusion Meetup (April 23, 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages