Hi David,

Yes I'd be interested as well. As an alternative you could integrate 
Redmine with Gitlab and use the Redmine Backlogs plugin.
http://www.redminebacklogs.net/

Francis

On Thursday, October 16, 2014 3:42:19 PM UTC+1, David Bezuidenhout wrote:
>
> Hi Jay,
>
> this looks amazing, and definitely something we (at our company) would be 
> interested in.
>
> Has there been any progress on releasing ScrumGui as either open source or 
> a paid for version?
>
>
> Regards,
> David
>
> On Wednesday, August 20, 2014 10:27:13 PM UTC+2, Jayinthebay wrote:
>>
>> Hi Marcel, 
>>
>>  
>>
>> We are using the GitLab API (with PHP + a local MySQL DB).  The GitLab 
>> API is described here:
>>
>>  
>>
>> https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlabhq/tree/master/doc/api
>>
>>  
>>
>> There's also a bit of hackery that involves using issue labels to 
>> maintain the status and type of issue. This works for us, but in a larger 
>> environment or one where you don't trust users not to mangle issue labels 
>> (on the GitLab side) this could be a problem for you.  I'm sort of planning 
>> to move this away from Gitlabs issue labels being a source of this status, 
>> and instead having ScrumGUI be the source (E.g. if it were changed on 
>> GitLab side, ScrumGUI would correct it again via the API)
>>
>>  
>>
>> - Jay
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, August 14, 2014 4:39:48 AM UTC-7, Marcel Steves wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Jayinthebay,
>>>
>>> your project sounds very interesting and I think there will be a lot of 
>>> people who like it, too.
>>>
>>> But one question:
>>> How do you implement it? As far as I know there is no plugin API 
>>> provided by GitLab.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Marcel
>>>
>>> Am Donnerstag, 7. August 2014 20:42:51 UTC+2 schrieb Jayinthebay:
>>>>
>>>> Greetings Gitlab Community, 
>>>>
>>>> Awhile back I was searching for a good scrum / kanban style interface 
>>>> for Gitlab. 
>>>>
>>>> If you've done the same you probably encountered some of these 
>>>> threads...
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/rauhryan/huboard/issues/190  [148 votes]
>>>>
>>>> http://feedback.gitlab.com/forums/176466-general/suggestions/3890905-use-huboard-as-project-management-tool
>>>>  
>>>> [422 votes]
>>>>
>>>> http://feedback.gitlab.com/forums/176466-general/suggestions/3840944-kanban-planning-view-for-issues
>>>>  
>>>> [169 votes]
>>>>
>>>> There seems to be a demand? I do appreciate Gitlab Team tried to 
>>>> implement something with the "Milestone View", but to me this didn't 
>>>> really 
>>>> satisfy what I was after. 
>>>>
>>>> So long story short, I made something myself. 
>>>>
>>>> Here's what it looks like:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <https://camo.githubusercontent.com/0b7781d4ba465c5989876a8cdc3496dfc092ecf2/687474703a2f2f6f6936302e74696e797069632e636f6d2f7272687779672e6a7067>
>>>>
>>>> ScrumGUI for GitLab (Github Repo) 
>>>> <https://github.com/Jayinthebay/scrumgui>
>>>> The workflow is pretty slick I think. It basically goes something like 
>>>> this for a typical issue/task:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    - Add an issue -- store it in "Userstory/Backlog" column until 
>>>>    you're ready to task it to someone
>>>>    - Assign task to project team member, move it to "Todo"  (Within 
>>>>    columns, tasks can be reordered for "prioritization")
>>>>    - Team member picks up the task and moves it to "In Progress" column
>>>>    - Team member then checks out branch for issue (e.g.  git checkout 
>>>>    -b jg_issue#2)
>>>>    - Team member then perform the work/code to meet criteria of the 
>>>>    issue & pushes this feature/issue branch back to origin
>>>>    - Team member drags issue from "In Progress" to "For Review" -- is 
>>>>    prompted for which commit to link to the review (e.g. jg_issue#2)
>>>>    - AWESOME PART:  The linked issue branch/commit is automatically 
>>>>    submitted as a merge request to DEV branch.  
>>>>    - If approved (via ScrumGUI) then the merge to DEV is approved 
>>>>    - You can then merge DEV to MASTER manually at your leisure for 
>>>>    release updates
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In the GitLab feed, it looks something like this for a single 
>>>> issue/feature approval with merge:
>>>>
>>>> <http://s1.postimg.org/6dq4yvhzj/gitlabside.png>
>>>> A lot of other little features here and there (e.g. integration with 
>>>> GitLab issue comments and distinguishing between user comments and 
>>>> git/gitlab process related noise, mapping of Gitlab roles for scrum roles, 
>>>> etc.)
>>>>
>>>> It's at the point now where we are using it internally for our own 
>>>> projects and it works well.  I'd would like to a burndown chart in it in 
>>>> the future and align it more closely to scrum/agile methodology.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, I have a little expense in this, and I was going back and forth 
>>>> on HOW I should release it. While a nice true Scrum/Kanban style board for 
>>>> GITLAB does seem to be unique, the concept is not. Many companies are 
>>>> already in the space in general (e.g. Jira, Huboard, ScrumDo). So I think 
>>>> I've decided to open source it and accept donations if anyone finds it 
>>>> useful... I'd like to recoup some expenses. If I can make some 
>>>> dinner/coffee money on top of that, that would be super. I'm sure you'll 
>>>> buy me a pizza or something right? :)
>>>>
>>>> I'm not quite ready to push the code to GITHUB. 
>>>>
>>>> I don't have any experience releasing source or dealing with software 
>>>> licenses, so if someone experienced in these areas who might benefit from 
>>>> me releasing this would be kind enough to offer some tips/suggestions for 
>>>> type of license I should use, that would be appreciated (and it will 
>>>> likely 
>>>> expedite release/availability of this thing). 
>>>>
>>>> Take care,
>>>> Jayinthebay (JG)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"GitLab" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to gitlabhq+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gitlabhq/9594377b-48f7-495e-9702-2b04e12113c8%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to