On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.ro...@gmail.com > wrote:
> ** > Em 31-08-2011 11:15, Marius Mårnes Mathiesen escreveu: > > - Is it necessary to kill with the KILL signal when stopping the Rots > server (slow_tests.rake line 15)? > > That wasn't my first trial. I tried "HUP" first, but I was getting an > exception so I gave up and used KILL instead. If you could make it work with > HUP, great. > Ah, okay. I would think INT would be a better suited signal; that's what Ctrl-C sends, afaik.HUP is often used to ask a process to reload it's configuration. > > > - Since we already have a rake/ruby process running, could we use a Rake > task for running the tests (test:slow:run)? > I think it should be possible to do something like: > > Rake::TestTask.new("slow_tests") do |test| > test.pattern = "test/slow/*.rb" > end > > task :run => [:start, :slow_tests] do > stop > end > > ? > > > Sorry, I'm not that good in Rake. Could you explains in details what you're > willing to achieve? I still didn't understand what you are asking for (or > suggesting)... > Rake includes tasks for running test files directly, without shelling out to Ruby manually (the Rake::TestTask class). Absolutely no biggie, just less code. > > > These are personal opinions only, feel free to ignore them :-) > > > I love personal opinions! :) I never ignore them :) > In that case, let's discuss football :-) > Also, I'd like to take the chance to better understand what you would like > me to work on from now on. Is there any other gem not supported by Rails > 3.1? > > I want to make sure we don't have any other dependency before start porting > Gitorious to Rails 3.1... > Did we discuss the routing issues in Gitorious at all on the list? Whether to keep the somewhat complex routing logic we have... - M -- To post to this group, send email to gitorious@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to gitorious+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com