On 2004.05.12 07:32 Damon Chaplin wrote:
But how is this going to work with the stuff like Undo/Redo that only works with GValues?
I think we may need our own GladeValue wrapper that has a GValue and extra data like pixmap filename/translatable flag/translator comments. We'd then need to update all the code that works on GValues to expect GladeValues instead.
Is there any better solution?
I haven't really been following what you're trying to do here so pardon me if this is rubbish...
If all you want to do is pass around a GdkPixbuf plus "stuff" as a GValue then can't you just register a new GBoxed type which contains the various bits-n-pieces and use g_value_set_boxed() and friends. The whole point of GValue is that it can hold any type of variable. You shouldn't need to abstract it any further.
Cheers,
-- J. Ali Harlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Glade-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-devel
