J. Ali Harlow wrote: > > On 2004.05.06 14:39 Joaquin Cuenca Abela wrote: > > > > The g_object_set_data approach seems good enough to > > me. These uses seems to be rare enough to need > > anything else. > > Talking about g_object_set_data, what I have always wanted > in glade is for the ability to set arbitary data for an > object. This would allow me to keep all sorts of userful > information in the .glade file rather than have it hardcoded > in my programs. I currently do this by encoding information > into the object name, but it's much less useful.
I want to second this request, in the OpenSource application for machine tools MatPLC (http://mat.sf.net) for the Human Machine Interface creator we use glade but we encode the information to link the widget to the IO (Input Output point) in the widgets name wich is cumbersome and a limited solution. Our application will also benefit if we could store something like properties for the widgets in the form of name and value both as character strings. Regards, Juan Carlos Orozco Director ACElab Industrial Automation http://www.acelab.com _______________________________________________ Glade-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/glade-devel
