> > Parting shot: isAlphaNum vs. isAlphanum? Haven't we been here before?
> > Don't the committee have more amusing (and less pointless and gratuitously
> > program-breaking) things to tinker with? (I know, nothing to do with
> > ghc, I'm just in a mood to 'give out'...)
> Ah, but each new committee has to make a few gratuitous changes
> to put their mark on the language. And they should be such that
> the user feels it. This is not the only pointless thing we changed. ;-)
No... Just the one this user has already pointlessly felt!
Incidentally, are my brain ceels failing entirely, or did either
the 1.3 or the 1.4 committee already make the opposite change?
Cheers,
Alex.
