2008/8/11 Thomas Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > (I am also no longer convinced that Darcs' automatic patch dependency > calculations are actually a good idea. Just because two patches don't touch > the same files, doesn't mean they aren't semantically dependent. Take for > example "monadification" patches, which are typically submitted split up for > each file. A branch captures those dependencies just fine.)
Darcs has a feature to deal with patches that are unrelated in patch theory but are related from the user's point of view. When you record you can use --ask-deps to specify dependent patches. These dependencies are then artificially enforced in commute (where dependencies are normally detected). Note: I'm not trying to advocate anything here, I just wanted to let you know that others noticed this and added a feature for it long ago. Jason
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users