Max Bolingbroke <batterseapo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/3/27 Simon Marlow <marlo...@gmail.com>:
> > I have a fix for num012 (the test is broken), but I still don't know
> > what's going on with num009.
>
> num009 has been broken on OS X for as long as I can remember :-).
If it is any help, I can confirm that num009 works correctly on a
PowerPC Mac with both ghc-6.8.2 and 6.10.1, but it fails on an Intel Mac
at least as far back as ghc-6.8.3.
Regards,
Malcolm
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
