Max Bolingbroke <batterseapo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > 2009/3/27 Simon Marlow <marlo...@gmail.com>: > > I have a fix for num012 (the test is broken), but I still don't know > > what's going on with num009. > > num009 has been broken on OS X for as long as I can remember :-).
If it is any help, I can confirm that num009 works correctly on a PowerPC Mac with both ghc-6.8.2 and 6.10.1, but it fails on an Intel Mac at least as far back as ghc-6.8.3. Regards, Malcolm _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users