Hello,

> I have a standalone (i.e. not integrated into the RTS yet) proof of concept
> working using kqueue. However, to be portable we still need to fall back to
> select on systems that don't support anything better. This implies that if you
> want to write portable code you still suffer from this limit.

If portability is important, how about falling back to poll(), not
epoll()?

> I've been unable to hack lately due to an injury but I'll be able to get back
> to it next week.

Take care.

--Kazu
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

Reply via email to