Hello, > I have a standalone (i.e. not integrated into the RTS yet) proof of concept > working using kqueue. However, to be portable we still need to fall back to > select on systems that don't support anything better. This implies that if you > want to write portable code you still suffer from this limit.
If portability is important, how about falling back to poll(), not epoll()? > I've been unable to hack lately due to an injury but I'll be able to get back > to it next week. Take care. --Kazu _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users