I suggest not using Haskell for your list. Put the data in a file and read it at runtime, or put it in a static C array and link it in.

Cheers,
        Simon

On 03/08/2009 22:09, Günther Schmidt wrote:
Hi Thomas,

yes, a source file with a single literal list with 85k elements.


Günther


Am 03.08.2009, 22:20 Uhr, schrieb Thomas DuBuisson
<thomas.dubuis...@gmail.com>:

Can you define "very large" and "compiler"? I know an old version of
GHC (6.6?) would eat lots of memory when there were absurd numbers of
let statements.

Thomas

2009/8/3 Günther Schmidt <red...@fedoms.com>:
Hi all,

I'm having trouble compiling very large source files, the compiler
eats 2GB
and then dies. Is there a way around it?

Günther
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users



_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

Reply via email to