Simon Marlow wrote: >>>> Simon Marlow wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I suggest if we stick with the independent repo approach that we >>>>>> have some automation to check that changes are indeed getting >>>>>> pushed upstream. [snip unhelpful suggestion from me] > > Yes, it tells you that you've screwed up, rather than telling you > that you're about to screw up, which would be much more convenient. > After you've screwed up it might be too late to fix it, due to > conflicts with upstream.
Can you arrange that the only way that patches can get into the branch is via darcs pull --intersection <upstream repo> ? Ganesh =============================================================================== Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html =============================================================================== _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
