On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:06:36AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: > On 27/08/2009 11:25, José Pedro Magalhães wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 18:15, Simon Marlow <marlo...@gmail.com >> <mailto:marlo...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> * Boot libraries are of several kinds: >> - INDEPENDENT: Independently maintained (e.g. time, haskeline) >> - COUPLED: Tightly coupled to GHC, but used by others (base) >> - SPECIFIC: Totally specific to GHC (e.g. template-haskell, DPH) >> >> >> Does syb fall under INDEPENDENT or COUPLED? >> >> In any case, as the syb maintainer, I'd favor (1) too. > > I'd say at this stage it's INDEPENDENT.
I think that once we move rebase3-compat (in the next few days, in the HEAD), the only thing that needs syb is extcore. Is that sufficient that it is worth keeping it as a core lib? Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users