Am 17.03.2011 12:49, schrieb Christian Maeder:
Am 23.02.2011 15:41, schrieb Ian Lynagh:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 05:17:35PM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
Am 22.02.2011 14:47, schrieb Ian Lynagh:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:59:20AM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
Where does cabal get its flags from? (hardcoded?)
From the "C compiler flags", "Gcc Linker flags" and "Ld Linker flags"
entries in ghc --info's output.
Since the sdk flags will be gone in ghc-7.0.3, re-adding them via the
command-line will not pass them to cabal. Should not more flags be
passed to cabal?
It still makes sense to pass these sdk flags, if one wants to produce
portable binaries.
Will there be no chance to produce 10.5 code on 10.6 machines? Can
dtrace (and its problems) be disabled on macs?
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4996
Only linking fails on MacOS 10.5, but a binary linked on MacOS 10.6
(using ghc-7.0.2 with its sdk flags for 10.5) will run under MacOS 10.5
as ghc-7.0.2 itself does to a large extend. (I assume ghc-7.0.2 was
built on MacOS 10.6).
Christian
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
