On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 02:03:15PM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
> Am 17.03.2011 12:49, schrieb Christian Maeder:
> >Am 23.02.2011 15:41, schrieb Ian Lynagh:
> >>On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 05:17:35PM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
> >>>Am 22.02.2011 14:47, schrieb Ian Lynagh:
> >>>>On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:59:20AM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Where does cabal get its flags from? (hardcoded?)
> >>>>
> >>>>From the "C compiler flags", "Gcc Linker flags" and "Ld Linker flags"
> >>>>entries in ghc --info's output.
> >
> >Since the sdk flags will be gone in ghc-7.0.3, re-adding them via the
> >command-line will not pass them to cabal. Should not more flags be
> >passed to cabal?
>
> It still makes sense to pass these sdk flags, if one wants to
> produce portable binaries.
We can't support both 10.5 and XCode 4:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5011
Building GHC on 10.5 still ought to work (but we can no longer support
it as a tier 1 platform).
Thanks
Ian
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
