On 30 August 2011 01:16, Evan Laforge <qdun...@gmail.com> wrote: > Interesting, maybe I misremembered? Or maybe there was some other guy > who was trying to parallelize? > > Just out of curiosity, what benefit does a thread-safe ghc provide? I > know ghc api users have go to some bother to not call re-entrantly... > what neat stuff could we do with a re-entrant ghc? Could it > eventually lead to an internally parallel ghc or are there deeper > reasons it's hard to parallelize compilation? That would be really > cool, if possible. In fact, I don't know of any parallel compilers.
Yes, the plan was to eventually have a parallel --make mode. _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
