On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Simon Marlow <marlo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 01/09/2011 08:44, Evan Laforge wrote: > >> Yes, the plan was to eventually have a parallel --make mode. >>> >> >> If that's the goal, wouldn't it be easier to start many ghcs? >> > > It's an interesting idea that I hadn't thought of. There would have to be > an atomic file system operation to "commit" a compiled module - getting that > right could be a bit tricky (compilation isn't deterministic, so the commit > has to be atomic). > I suppose you could just rename it into place when you're done. -Edward
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users