On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:42, Brent Yorgey <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not sure at this point which way I would lean on the issue. > Having infix type constructors that don't have to start with : is > something I would like, too. But I just thought I would point out > that code like tc192 is not as esoteric as you seem to think. > I seem to recall @src outputting a Prelude definition for something (Monoid?) that used (*) as a type variable. -- brandon s allbery [email protected] wandering unix systems administrator (available) (412) 475-9364 vm/sms
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
