Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 19.01.2012, 07:11 -0500 schrieb Matthew Farkas-Dyck: > On 19/01/2012, Joachim Breitner <[email protected]> wrote: > > (I have no good idea, but here is at least one: A dot '.' as the first > > character indicates a type variable; compared to a ':' this is a > > non-capitalized character). > > So that all symbols that start in dot are variables, and all others > are types/constructors?
exactly, that would be an option to get the benefit of the proposal (nicer type constructor operator names) without giving up completely on type variable operators names. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner [email protected] | [email protected] | GPG: 0x4743206C xmpp: [email protected] | http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
