On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Philip Holzenspies <[email protected]>wrote:
> So, there are many things people read in the proposal that I didn't want > to put in, but the things I very much do want to include get lost in > translation also. I wanted to allow the GHC source itself to be written in > markdown. If the existing source tree is using one form of markup, changes and additions should really be consistent with what's already there instead of introducing a new kind of markup. This could actually be *more* disruptive. -- brandon s allbery [email protected] wandering unix systems administrator (available) (412) 475-9364 vm/sms
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
