Understood

I've got another RPi supposed to arrive this week - would more computation 
power help anyone out there?

Neil

On 13 Jan 2013, at 15:59, rocon...@theorem.ca wrote:

> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013, Neil Davies wrote:
> 
>> Sounds like we're close - I must admit I've slightly lost track of the 
>> things that need to be done.
>> 
>> Can we start collecting the pre-conditionds and steps, when each complete 
>> build takes best part of a day, its difficult to keep the context.
>> 
>> So - taking the ghc 7.4.1 that is part of raspian wheezy (pkg version 
>> 7.4.1-4+rpi1) which depends upon (amongst others) llvm-3.0 (pkg version 
>> 3.0-10), can we capture the changes?
>> 
>> 
>> Which version of LLVM is being used?
> 
> I'm using LLVM 3.1 and gcc 4.6.3 and ghc 7.4.1.
> 
>> Which ghc source(s) are you starting from?
> 
> ghc-7.6.1 with 
> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/attachment/ticket/5914/0001-add-support-for-ARM-hard-float-ABI-fixes-5914.patch
> applied, fixing the hunks in compiler/main/DriverPipeline.hs by hand.
> 
>> What files did you need to touch in the make process?  Please supply diffs
> 
> I've been fiddling with various parmameters in mk/build.mk.
> 
>> Anything else?
> 
> I haven't got it compiling yet.
> 
> Oh I'm currently using the raspian distriubtion with uses the hard-float ABI, 
> but my end-goal is to bootstrap a nix package.
> 
> -- 
> Russell O'Connor                                      <http://r6.ca/>
> ``All talk about `theft,''' the general counsel of the American Graphophone
> Company wrote, ``is the merest claptrap, for there exists no property in
> ideas musical, literary or artistic, except as defined by statute.''


_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

Reply via email to