Where / How do you indicate whether the underlying GlusterFS is used/tested using fusemount or libgfapi method or both ?
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Here is a table representing the current state of Gluster testing. > > * Things in green are categories for which we have some kind of testing in > place. > * Things in red are the ones which don't have any tests. > * Things in yellow are the ones which have no known tests or are not > managed by Gluster community. > > > > Test Category/Sub-Category > > > > > > smoke source build + Posix complaince + Dbench > > > > > functional tests/basic > > > > > regression tests/bugs > > > > > performance regression N/A > > > > > integration Backends/FS Protocols Consumers/Cloud Environments Tools libgfapi > bindings OS environment xfs smb qemu gdeploy java firewalld ext4 nfs > openstack/cinder heketi python ufw btrfs swift openshift/docker/containers > ruby selinux zfs > aws > go apparmor > > azure > > > > > hadoop > > > update major version upgrades minor version upgrades > > > > longevity a. memory leaks > b. log accumulation > > > > > distro packaging a. pkg build + smoke > b. sysvinit/systemd > > > > > > > I will send separate mails for each of the categories above highlighting > plans for them. > > Use this thread to indicate addition/deletion/changes to this matrix. > We will put this at gluster.org website once it is final. > > Thanks, > Raghavendra Talur & MSV Bhat > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel