WRT performance. I would be happy to kick of daily performance regression runs on what ever you guys would like. My current daily runs don't take any more than 6-8 hours, I could fit another 4 hours in there for upstream. I could also run them on RDMA to help out on some coverage there. LMK what you think, I already have this implemented and its just a matter of setting how often we want it run and on what config / builds. LMK what you think and we can have something real quick.
-b On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Deepak Shetty <dpkshe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Where / How do you indicate whether the underlying GlusterFS is > used/tested using fusemount or libgfapi method or both ? > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Here is a table representing the current state of Gluster testing. >> >> * Things in green are categories for which we have some kind of testing >> in place. >> * Things in red are the ones which don't have any tests. >> * Things in yellow are the ones which have no known tests or are not >> managed by Gluster community. >> >> >> >> Test Category/Sub-Category >> >> >> >> >> >> smoke source build + Posix complaince + Dbench >> >> >> >> >> functional tests/basic >> >> >> >> >> regression tests/bugs >> >> >> >> >> performance regression N/A >> >> >> >> >> integration Backends/FS Protocols Consumers/Cloud Environments Tools libgfapi >> bindings OS environment xfs smb qemu gdeploy java firewalld ext4 nfs >> openstack/cinder heketi python ufw btrfs swift >> openshift/docker/containers >> ruby selinux zfs >> aws >> go apparmor >> >> azure >> >> >> >> >> hadoop >> >> >> update major version upgrades minor version upgrades >> >> >> >> longevity a. memory leaks >> b. log accumulation >> >> >> >> >> distro packaging a. pkg build + smoke >> b. sysvinit/systemd >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I will send separate mails for each of the categories above highlighting >> plans for them. >> >> Use this thread to indicate addition/deletion/changes to this matrix. >> We will put this at gluster.org website once it is final. >> >> Thanks, >> Raghavendra Talur & MSV Bhat >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel