We use samba VFS quite heavily in our infrastructure. Integrated with AD via winbind, load balanced SMB front-ends based on HA with auto failover. This system has been in production for about 4 months. So far it's worked very well.
Dave On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Matt Miller <m...@mattandtiff.net> wrote: > Yesterday was my first day on the list, so I had not yet seen that thread. > Appears to be working though. Will have to setup some load tests. > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Daniel Müller > <muel...@tropenklinik.de>wrote: > >> No, not really: >> Look at my thread: samba vfs objects glusterfs is it now working? >> I am just waiting for an answer to fix this. >> The only way I succeeded to make it work is how you descriped (exporting >> fuse mount thru samba) >> >> >> >> EDV Daniel Müller >> >> Leitung EDV >> Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus >> Paul-Lechler-Str. 24 >> 72076 Tübingen >> Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499 >> eMail: muel...@tropenklinik.de >> Internet: www.tropenklinik.de >> "Der Mensch ist die Medizin des Menschen" >> >> >> >> >> Von: gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org >> [mailto:gluster-users-boun...@gluster.org] Im Auftrag von Matt Miller >> Gesendet: Montag, 10. Februar 2014 16:43 >> An: gluster-users@gluster.org >> Betreff: [Gluster-users] Gluster, Samba, and VFS >> >> Stumbled upon >> >> https://forge.gluster.org/samba-glusterfs/samba-glusterfs-vfs/commits/master >> when trying to find info on how to make Gluster and Samba play nice as a >> general purpose file server. I have had severe performance problems in >> the >> past with mounting the Gluster volume as a Fuse mount, then exporting the >> Fuse mount thru Samba. As I found out after setting up the cluster this >> is >> somewhat expected when serving out lots of small files. Was hoping VFS >> would provide better performance when serving out lots and lots of small >> files. >> Is anyone using VFS extensions in production? Is it ready for prime >> time? >> I could not find a single reference to it on Gluster's main website >> (maybe I >> am looking in the wrong place), so not sure of the stability or >> supported-ness of this. >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users