2010/10/1 Burkhard Plaum <[email protected]>:
> Hi,
>
> Am 01.10.2010 16:03, schrieb Cristian Morales Vega:
> [...]
>>> Ok, now it gets messy. My suggestion: Can you make this (and future) 
>>> patches against CVS
>>> instead of 0.4.3? Other than that, your fixes (bg_gtk_* wrappers) are 
>>> perfectly correct.
>>>
>>> I'm currently in a preparation phase for 1.0.0 and fixing stuff in the 
>>> current code
>>> is much more useful than repeating old fixes. Some of the gtk problems are 
>>> already fixed
>>> in CVS, and I don't want to go trough this more than once.
>>
>> Yes, sorry. I took the gtk 2.20 fixes from CVS and added the 2.22 over
>> them. This one applies cleanly on latest CVS version.
>
> Done

OK, you have my word I will not look at it again until, at least, the
next release ;-)

This one adds the missing -lxxx's to vis_scope. Otherwise it fails to
link with the --no-undefined option.
Index: plugins/visualization/Makefile.am
===================================================================
--- plugins/visualization/Makefile.am.orig
+++ plugins/visualization/Makefile.am
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ AM_CFLAGS = \
 -DDATA_DIR=\"$(pkgdatadir)\"
 
 
-LDADD = @MODULE_LIBADD@
+vis_scope_la_LIBADD = @MODULE_LIBADD@ -lm
 plugin_LTLIBRARIES = \
 vis_scope.la
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________
Gmerlin-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gmerlin-general

Reply via email to