It looks conforming for me. Why do you think it is not?
Best,
Mikhail
On 10/13/2014 08:17 AM, Alessandro Vicini wrote:
Hullo Mikhail,
you're right, there was a mistake in the example. But take the attached geo
file, now the surface is completely embedded, but still the 3D mesh doesn't
look conformal...
Regards,
Alessandro
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Mikhail Artemyev [mailto:[email protected]]
Inviato: lunedì 13 ottobre 2014 15.12
A: [email protected]; [email protected]
Oggetto: Re: Surface embedded in volume
Hi Alessandro,
I think the reason why it doesn't work is because Surface In Volume will
work for surfaces which are totally inside a volume. Your surface #30 is
not, because of the lines #14 and #16 crossing surfaces #26 and #22 of the
volume. Therefore, try to embed those lines in the surfaces first:
Line {14} In Surface {26};
Line {16} In Surface {22};
That seems to work.
Best,
Mikhail
On 10/11/2014 05:00 AM, [email protected] wrote:
With reference to the attached .geo file, I am trying to embed surface
#30 in the volume so that the 3D mesh will conform to the 2d mesh of
the surface. However, it doesn't seem to work. What am I doing wrong?
Thank you.
Regards,
Alessandro
_______________________________________________
gmsh mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
