Dear Gromacsers,
   
  I have been doing free energy perturbations Gly->Ala in one strand of 
collagene.
   
  Now, the problem is that I have later closely reread the section 5.6.4 ("Free
  Energy Calculations") p. 105 in which it says:
  "Bonded interactions between atoms that are not perturbed do not need B 
parameter specifications ..".
   
  My questions are:
  1. Does this mean that bonded interactions between atoms that ARE perturbed 
DO need B parameter specifications? Even if they are the same in state 
A and B?
  2. What about the other topology parameters (angles, dihedrals etc), do they 
need to be specified too?
  3. What happens if I have not specified these specifications?
   
  The relevant parts of the topology file which I use are:
   
  [ atoms ]
....
      87          N     13    ALA      N     49      -0.28    14.0067   ; qtot 
0.72
    88          H     13    ALA      H     49       0.28      1.008   ; qtot 1
    89        CH2     13    ALA     CA     50          0     14.027  CH1  0.0  
3.019   ; qtot 1
    90        DUM     13    ALA     CB     50          0     15.035  CH3  0.0 
15.035   ; qtot 1
    91          C     13    ALA      C     51       0.38     12.011   ; qtot 
1.38
    92          O     13    ALA      O     51      -0.38    15.9994   ; qtot 1
...
   
  [ bonds ]
...
     87    89     2    gb_20
   89    90     2    gb_26
   89    91     2    gb_26
...
   
  [ angles ]
  ....
     85    87    89     2    ga_30
   88    87    89     2    ga_17
   87    89    90     2    ga_12
   87    89    91     2    ga_12
   90    89    91     2    ga_12
   89    91    92     2    ga_29
   89    91    93     2    ga_18
 ....
   
  And so on, ie, no B specifications have been done except for the atoms!
   
   
  Best regards, and thank you in anticipation,
  Soren
   
   
  Ps. One (non-gromacs -sorry) question, given that the above is not wrong:
  For the pertubation Gly->Ala I have get a deltaG of 0.8 kcal/mol. Looking 
through literature, this does not seem all wrong, say if the pertubation took 
place in an alpha-helix. On the other hand, it is close to the thermal energy 
(~kT), and a previous article doing the exact same perturbation arrives at a 
deltaG around 8.6 kcal/mol. Could anyone comment on that?

                
---------------------------------

Alt i én. Få Yahoo! Mail med adressekartotek, kalender og notesblok. 
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to