The best way to find out is by looking at the dihedrals fpor the aminoacid as defined by the forcefield. Someone may know it by heart, but to make sure you need to check it yourself anway. It'll be hard to defend your results before a picky referee by saying that "this dude on a mailing list said so".

Erik

maria goranovic skrev 2011-03-29 11.51:
Just curious, this would also hold true for the OPLA-AA force field. It is all-atom, so no changes seems to be necessary besides making a d-amino acid in the input ?

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Mark Abraham <mark.abra...@anu.edu.au <mailto:mark.abra...@anu.edu.au>> wrote:

    On 28/03/2011 8:45 PM, maria goranovic wrote:
    That would mean that a new residue type will not be required? I
    just need the correct input D-coordinates?

    Try it, before asking about it :-) I said "I suspect you do not
    need to change anything about the topology", but I haven't
    actually done anything like this ever. Topologies and code
    shouldn't care about chirality, so you shouldn't need to do
    anything other than input the configuration you want.

    Mark


    On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Mark Abraham
    <mark.abra...@anu.edu.au <mailto:mark.abra...@anu.edu.au>> wrote:

        On 26/03/2011 2:27 AM, maria goranovic wrote:
        Yes, that would be the correct way to do this. I was hoping
        to take a shorter route, and just modifying a couple of
        dihedrals in the topology files output by pdb2gmx without
        having to make a new residue. Is that not possible at all ?

        Unlike (say) AMBER's leap, pdb2gmx doesn't generate
        coordinates in a general sense. It generates a topology that
        matches given coordinates, fixing a few details as directed.
        It will fill valences with hydrogen atoms, generate terminal
        groups, organize disulfides, and choose protonation states of
        titratable residues, but it won't change geometries in the
        way you seem to want.

        Neither does anything in the .top/.itp files stipulate the
        chirality of any center (in all-atom models). Various
        dihedral angles change sign with chirality, but the dihedral
        functions are all symmetric about the y-axis (i.e. even). So
        I suspect you do not need to change anything about the
        topology. Just use a molecule builder to change the chirality
        of the relevant center in the input file to pdb2gmx.

        Mark



    --
    gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
    <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
    http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
    Please search the archive at
    http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
    Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
    www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
    <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>.
    Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




--
Maria G.
Technical University of Denmark
Copenhagen


--
-----------------------------------------------
Erik Marklund, PhD student
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596,    75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone:    +46 18 471 4537        fax: +46 18 511 755
er...@xray.bmc.uu.se    http://folding.bmc.uu.se/

-- 
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to