On 6/05/2011 10:17 PM, Gavin Melaugh wrote:
Yeah I see your point about the types. With regard to the initial
configuration state I would have assumed that gromacs knew the initial
position of the virtual site  when I stated that it was to be at the
COG  of the  3 atoms in  the [virtual_sitesn] directive.

Yes it does, but (IIRC) the implementation requires that each of the constructing atoms and the virtual atom(s) are distinct atoms. mdrun does the book-keeping to know which atoms are sensible at different stages of the integration. So the input coordinate file needs to have such atoms there, but I rather suspect their coordinates will get ignored - that's easily tested, of course.

Mark

Justin A. Lemkul wrote:

Gavin Melaugh wrote:
Justin

I have tried this but I am now getting different errors. I take it that:
I specify the virtual sites in the atomtypes directive as I have seen
from examples?
Virtual sites are included in all the force fields already, but if you
want some custom name, then yes, include them in a new [atomtypes]
directive.  I see no reason to create three distinct, but identical,
types as you have.

I index the virtual sites in the atoms directive in accordance with the
rest of the molecule. atom numbers go from 1-228, therefore I label the
3 virtual sites 229 to231.
The error I get now is

Atom index (229) in virtual_sites3 out of bounds (1-228).
This probably means that you have inserted topology section
"virtual_sites3"
in a part belonging to a different molecule than you intended to.
In that case move the "virtual_sites3" section to the right molecule.

Do I have to have the virtual sites in the gro file also? This doesn't
make sense

Yes, you need their coordinates as part of the initial state.

-Justin


--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to