Sanku M wrote:
OKK, But, before, I have tried using md as integrator where I start the initial velocity as 280K ( which makes sense as the minimized configuration is essentially at low temperature) and have used Nose-hoover at 300K and I never had problem in getting the desired 300K after running a short NVT simulation as equilabration.
The problem arises when sd integrator is used.
In fact, I just tried to generate the initial velocity at 300K along with sd integrator. I got the 303 K as average temperature again. The same simulation using md integrator always gives rise to 300K as average temperature( when used in conjunction with Nose-Hoover ) , even if I generate velocity at 280 K or 300K .

I guess that the initial velocity-generation temperature should not be an issue here. The sd integrator in contrast to md integrator may be the problem.



I have never had such a problem when using sd. I can always achieve the target temperature within 0.5 K, if not exactly, so I do not believe there is an inherent problem with sd. Your first post indicated that your statistics were collected over the entire timeframe, which will not be correct for reasons I have already described. The initial frames will represent unequilibrated data that may skew the averages. What if you analyze only the last half of the time? The last 1 ns?

-Justin

--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to