Sanku M wrote:
Hi Justin,
I did calculate the average temperature using last 2 ns of the 8ns data. It is still same 303K.


Going back to the original .mdp file, I can see that you're using some incorrect settings. You've set rlist=rvdw even though you're using a shifted potential for van der Waals interactions. Surely grompp should have warned you that this would lead to poor energy conservation. Your solvent is probably heating up as a result and leading to the incorrect temperature.

-Justin

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Justin A. Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu>
*To:* Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users@gromacs.org>
*Sent:* Tue, August 2, 2011 9:55:40 PM
*Subject:* Re: [gmx-users] Problem with temperature and stochastic dynamics in FEP



Sanku M wrote:
> OKK, But, before, I have tried using md as integrator where I start the initial velocity as 280K ( which makes sense as the minimized configuration is essentially at low temperature) and have used Nose-hoover at 300K and I never had problem in getting the desired 300K after running a short NVT simulation as equilabration.
 > The problem arises when sd integrator is used.
> In fact, I just tried to generate the initial velocity at 300K along with sd integrator. I got the 303 K as average temperature again. The same simulation using md integrator always gives rise to 300K as average temperature( when used in conjunction with Nose-Hoover ) , even if I generate velocity at 280 K or 300K .
 >
> I guess that the initial velocity-generation temperature should not be an issue here. The sd integrator in contrast to md integrator may be the problem.
 >
 >

I have never had such a problem when using sd. I can always achieve the target temperature within 0.5 K, if not exactly, so I do not believe there is an inherent problem with sd. Your first post indicated that your statistics were collected over the entire timeframe, which will not be correct for reasons I have already described. The initial frames will represent unequilibrated data that may skew the averages. What if you analyze only the last half of the time? The last 1 ns?

-Justin

-- ========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
-- gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to